A Benchmarking Survey of Open Access Funds at the University of California
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30649Abstract
Objective – The purpose of this study was to examine the status and viability of application-based open access funds (OAFs) across the University of California (UC) Libraries to assist with long-term planning for this type of funding at UC.
Methods – In 2022, the authors surveyed the 10 UC campus libraries about both the outcome of an earlier UC-wide OAF pilot and the current status of application-based OAFs to support article processing charges (APCs), book processing charges (BPCs), and open educational resources (OERs). Five campuses reported having a current OAF. These five campuses responded to additional questions about their budgets and their sustainability, the number of publications funded, policies, and staffing resources for managing the OAF.
Results – Five UC campuses had an active application-based OAF, with budgets or expenditures ranging from $20,000 - $271,000 annually. Only two campuses felt their budget was sustainable. One of the five campuses closed its fund after the survey. The number of staff resources per fund ranged from 1 to 6 with 3 to 32 hours of work weekly. Funding policies were similar to other institutional OAFs with some distinctions. All campuses had revised their criteria to disallow funding for journals covered by UC’s transformative open access agreements.
Conclusion – Providing application-based funds for OA publishing at high-publishing academic institutions requires a substantial budget and workforce. Though these funds benefit some authors, the wider equity of APCs and BPCs needs to be considered.
Downloads
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2022). Exploring the hidden impacts of open access financing mechanisms: AAAS survey on scholarly publication experiences and perspectives. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/OpenAccessSurveyReport_Oct2022_FINAL.pdf
Ashworth, S., Mccutcheon, V., & Roy, L. (2014). Managing open access: The first year of managing RCUK and Wellcome Trust OA funding at the University of Glasgow Library. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 27(3), 282-286. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.175
Beaubien, S., Garrison, J., & Way, D. (2016). Evaluating an open access publishing fund at a comprehensive university. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(3), Article eP1204. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1204
Buckholtz, A. (1999). SPARC: The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition: Theme: Electronic journals in science and technology libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 22. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1466
Chodacki, J., & Gould, M. (2022, August 18). Pathways to open access: Open infrastructure and CDL. University of California Office of Scholarly Communication. https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2022/08/pathways-to-oa-open-infrastructure/
Click, A. B., & Borchardt, R. (2019). Library supported open access funds: Criteria, impact, and viability. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29623
Compact for Open-Access Publishing Equity. (n.d.). Overview. http://www.oacompact.org/
Crow, R., Gallagher, R., & Naim, K. (2020). Subscribe to Open: A practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1262
Dartmouth Libraries. (n.d.). Open access publishing form. https://osf.io/a6ruc
Doney, J., & Kenyon, J. (2022). Researchers’ perceptions and experiences with an open access subvention fund. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(1), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30015
Eckman, C. D., & Weil, B. T. (2010). Institutional open access funds: Now is the time. PLOS Biology, 8(5), Article e1000375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000375
Estelle, L., & Wise, A. (2023). OASPA Equity in Open Access Workshop 1 report. Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7733869
Farb, S. E., & Grappone, T. (2014). The UCLA Libraries Affordable Course Materials Initiative: Expanding access, use, and affordability of course materials. Against the Grain, 26(5), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.6848
Farley, A., Langham-Putrow, A., Shook, E., Sterman, L. B., & Wacha, M. (2021). Transformative agreements: Six myths, busted. College & Research Libraries News, 82(7), 298. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.82.7.298
Folan, B. (2023, January 23). The ‘OA market’ - what is healthy? Part 1. Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association. https://www.oaspa.org/news/the-oa-market-what-is-healthy-part-1/
Glushko, R., Hampson, C., Moore, P., & Yates, E. (2015). Open access funds: Getting a bigger bang for our bucks. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference 2015, 571-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284316320
Gyore, R., Reeve, A. C., Cameron-Vedros, C., Ludwig, D., & Emmett, A. (2015). Campus open access funds: Experiences of the KU “One University” open access author fund. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), Article eP1252. https://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1252
Hacker, A. (2023). Open access in Switzerland: An institutional point of view. College & Research Libraries News, 84(6), 212-216. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.6.212
Hampson, C. (2014). The adoption of open access funds among Canadian academic research libraries, 2008-2012. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v9i2.3115
Hampson, C., & Stregger, E. (2017). Measuring cost per use of library-funded open access article processing charges: Examination and implications of one method. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5(1), Article eP2182. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2182
Harington, R. (2020, December 16). Transformative agreements, funders and the publishing ecosystem: A lack of focus on equity. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/12/16/transformative-agreements-funders-and-the-publishing-ecosystem-a-lack-of-focus-on-equity/
Harvard Library. (n.d.). HOPE Fund. Harvard https://osc.hul.harvard.edu/programs/hope/ or https://osf.io/zcsuj
Hudson-Ward, A. (2021, March 30). The missed moment to elevate open access as DEIA imperative. Choice. https://www.choice360.org/tie-post/the-missed-moment-to-elevate-open-access-as-deia-imperative/
Inefuku, H. W., Brundy, C., & Lair, S. (2024). Building community: Supporting minoritized scholars through library publishing and open and equitable revenue models. College & Research Libraries, 85(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.1.64
Johnson, R., & Ficarra, V. (2021a, July). Co-creating a healthy and diverse open access market: Issue brief. Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5497869
Johnson, R., & Ficarra, V. (2021b, September). Co-creating a healthy and diverse open access market: Workshop report. Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5534551
Kennesaw State University Library System. (n.d.). Open access publishing fund. https://www.kennesaw.edu/library/open-access-publishing.php or https://osf.io/8zhax
Kennison, R., Ruttenberg, J., Shorish, Y., & Thompson, L. (2019, September 11). OA in the open: Community needs and perspectives [White paper]. LIS Scholarship Archive. https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/g972d
Klebel, T., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2023). The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00245
Korolev, S. (2022). The tenth anniversary of the UWM Open Access Publication Fund (UWM Libraries Other Staff Publications 16). University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. https://dc.uwm.edu/lib_staffart/16
Kwon, D. (2022). Open-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00342-w
Lara, K. (2015). The library’s role in the management and funding of open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150102
Library Publishing Coalition. (n.d.). Library Publishing Directory. https://librarypublishing.org/lp-directory
McMillan, G., O’Brien, L., & Lener, E. F. (2023). OA and the academy: Evaluating an OA fund with authors’ input. College & Research Libraries, 84(3), 357-373. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.3.357
McMillan, G., O’Brien, L., & Young, P. (2016). Funding article processing charges (SPEC Kit 353). Association of Research Libraries. https://publications.arl.org/Funding-Article-Processing-Charges-SPEC-Kit-353/
Newman, K. A., Blecic, D. D., & Armstrong, K. L. (2007). Scholarly communication education initiatives (SPEC Kit 299). Association of Research Libraries. https://publications.arl.org/Scholarly-Communication-SPEC-Kit-299/
Open Access Directory. (2018, August 1). Discontinued OA publication funds. Simmons University School of Library and Information Science. https://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/index.php?title=Discontinued_OA_publication_funds&oldid=27275
Open Access Directory. (2024, January 16). OA publication funds. Simmons University School of Library ad Information Science. https://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/index.php?title=OA_publication_funds&oldid=29143
Reinsfelder, T. L., & Pike, C. A. (2018). Using library funds to support open access publishing through crowdfunding: Going beyond article processing charges. Collection Management, 43(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2017.1415826
SPARC. (n.d.) Campus open access funds. https://sparcopen.org/our-work/oa-funds/
Springer Nature. (2024). Funding & support services. https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/funding or https://osf.io/yd7c2
Squazzoni, F., Bravo, G., Grimaldo, F., García-Costa, D., Farjam, M., & Mehmani, B. (2021). Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. PLOS One, 16(10), Article e0257919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257919
Swift, A., & Taylor, A. (2022a). OA fund UC benchmarking survey instrument. Qualtrics. https://osf.io/vne2p
Swift, A., & Taylor, A. (2022b). OA fund UC benchmarking survey report 2022. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/fjn56
Swift, A., & Taylor, A. (2022c, September 21). OA fund UC benchmarking survey report presentation [Slide deck]. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/5savq
Swift, A., & Taylor, A. (2022d, September 21). OA fund UC benchmarking survey results data [Data set]. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/ahd67
Tananbaum, G. (2010). Campus-based open-access publishing funds: A practical guide to design and implementation. SPARC. https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/oafunds-v1.pdf
Tananbaum, G. (2014). North American campus-based open access funds: A five-year progress report. SPARC. https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/OA-Fund-5-Year-Review.pdf
Taylor, A. (2021, December 22). Open access fund targets students, early career researchers. UCSF Library. https://www.library.ucsf.edu/news/open-access-fund-targets-students-early-career-researchers/
Taylor, A. (2022, May 26). UCSF’s open access fund replaced by transformative open access publisher agreements. UCSF Library. https://www.library.ucsf.edu/news/ucsfs-open-access-fund-replaced-by-transformative-open-access-publisher-agreements/
Tenopir, C., Dalton, E., Christian, L., Jones, M., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A. (2017). Imagining a gold open access future: Attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 824-843. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824
Teplitzky, S., & Phillips, M. (2015, October 16). Evaluating the impact of open access at Berkeley: A qualitative analysis of the BRII program [Conference poster]. LAUC-B Conference, Berkeley, CA, United States. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8c33n5fn
Tricco, A. C., Nincic, V., Darvesh, N., Rios, P., Khan, P. A., Ghassemi, M. M., MacDonald, H., Yazdi, F., Lai, Y., Warren, R., Austin, A., Cleary, O., Baxter, N. N., Burns, K. E. A., Coyle, D., Curran, J. A., Graham, I. D., Hawker, G., Légaré, F., … Straus, S. E. (2023). Global evidence of gender equity in academic health research: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 13(2), Article e067771. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067771
UC Berkeley Library. (2024, August 16). Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII): Program description. https://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/brii/description or https://osf.io/7cjtu
UC Libraries. (n.d.). Common knowledge groups. https://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/ckg/
UC San Diego Library. (2024, August 7). Open access publishing & policies: Open access publishing discounts. https://ucsd.libguides.com/scholcom/discounts or https://osf.io/jh68s
UC Scholarly Communication Officers Group. (2012). UC OA fund pilot proposal. UC Libraries. https://osf.io/umtzs
UCLA Library. (n.d.). Affordable Course Materials Initiative (ACMI). https://www.library.ucla.edu/about/programs/affordable-course-materials-initiative-acmi/ or https://osf.io/gwb2a
UCSF Library (2024, November 25) Discounts and funding for open access publishing. https://libraryhelp.ucsf.edu/hc/en-us/articles/360036082334-Discounts-and-Funding-for-Open-Access-Publishing or https://osf.io/rpv9t
University of Arizona Libraries. (n.d.). Open access support. https://lib.arizona.edu/about/awards/oa-fund or https://osf.io/4hjft
University of California Office of Scholarly Communication. (2024, January 31). UC transformative agreements report, Jan 1, 2022 - July 31, 2023 [Unpublished report].
University of California Office of Scholarly Communication. (n.d.-a). Guidelines for prioritizing transformative open access agreements. https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/uc-publisher-relationships/guidelines-for-evaluating-transformative-open-access-agreements/
University of California Office of Scholarly Communication. (n.d.-b). OA publishing agreements and discounts. https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/for-authors/publishing-discounts/
University of California Office of Scholarly Communication. (n.d.-c). Open Access strategies at UC. Retrieved September 30, 2024, from https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/scholarly-publishing/pathways-to-oa/
University of California Office of Scholarly Communication. (n.d.-d). Why publish open access? Office of Scholarly Communication. Retrieved September 30, 2024, from https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/for-authors/open-access/
University of Ottawa Library. (n.d.). Financial support for open access publishing. https://www.uottawa.ca/library/scholarly-communication/uottawa-initiatives/financial-support or https://osf.io/78hvw
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anneliese Taylor, Allegra Swift
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
