Evaluating the Impact of Information Literacy Workshops on Student Success
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30698Abstract
Objective – This study was designed to identify the impact of standalone information literacy tutorials on student success indicators. The study was conducted in two different phases to compare findings across different modalities and to identify whether online, asynchronous delivery of substantively similar content affected outcomes.
Methods – Using institutional records from a mid-sized, Midwestern public university, and attendance and completion data from student participation in asynchronous library workshops, the authors used propensity score matching to construct a control group that mirrored library workshop participants based on like characteristics. Statistical analyses were then conducted comparing the GPA, semester completion, and retention rates between the two groups.
Results – Students who completed at least one information literacy workshop had significantly higher semester GPAs (M = 3.25, SD = 0.85, SE = 0.06) than non-participants (M = 2.99, SD = 1.13, SE = 0.07); significantly higher semester completion rates (M = 0.93, SD = 0.18, SE = 0.01) than non-participants (M = 0.87, SD = 0.27, SE = 0.02); and substantially higher odds (OR = 3.5) of returning to the university the following semester than non-participants.
Conclusion – The findings in this study provide evidence for librarians advocating for the benefit of information literacy instruction on student success, particularly for undergraduate student retention. Additionally, library instruction programs making decisions about where to focus resources will find the comparisons between outcomes for online and traditional methods of instruction informative.
Downloads
References
Anderson, K., & May, F. A. (2010). Does the method of instruction matter? An experimental examination of information literacy instruction in the online, blended, and face-to-face classrooms. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.005
Bordignon, M., Otis, A., Georgievski, A., Peters, J., Strachan, G., Muller, J., & Tamin, R. (2016). Assessment of online information literacy learning objects for first year community college English composition. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8T922
Bowles-Terry, M., & Donovan, C. (2016). Serving notice on the one-shot: changing roles for instruction librarians. International Information & Library Review, 48(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1176457
Cook, D. (2022). Is the library one-shot effective? A meta-analytic study. College & Research Libraries, 83(5), 739-750. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.5.739
Gariepy, L. W., Peacemaker, B., & Colon, V. (2017). Stop chasing unicorns: Setting reasonable expectations for the impact of library instruction programs (and other library services) on student success. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2017-0025
Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019623
Head, A. (2013). "Learning the ropes: How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college." https://projectinfolit.org/publications/first-year-experience-study/
Hess, A. N. (2014). Online and face-to-face library instruction: assessing the impact on upper-level sociology undergraduates. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.934122
Hill, L., Maier-Katkin, D., Ladny, R., & Kinsley, K. (2018). When in doubt, go to the library: The effect of a library-intensive freshman research and writing seminar on academic success. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2017.1372498
Irwin, V., Wang, K., Jung, J., Kessler, E., Tezil, T., Alhassani, S., Filbey, A., Dilig, R., and Bullock Mann, F. (2024). Report on the condition of education 2024 (NCES 2024-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2024/2024144.pdf
Jones, K. M. L., Asher, A., Goben, A., Perry, M. R., Salo, D., Briney, K. A., & Robertshaw, M. B. (2020). “We’re being tracked at all times”: Student perspectives of their privacy in relation to learning analytics in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 71(9), 1044–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24358
Jones, W. L. & Mastrorilli, T. (2022). Assessing the impact of an information literacy course on students’ academic achievement: A mixed-methods study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30090
Kot, F., & Jones, J. (2015). The impact of library resource utilization on undergraduate students’ academic performance: A propensity score matching design. College & Research Libraries, 76(5), 566-586. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.5.566
Koufogiannakis, D., & Wiebe, N. (2006). Effective methods for teaching information literacy skills to undergraduate students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 1(3), 3–43. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/76/153
Kraemer, E. W., Lombardo, S. V., & Lepkowski, F. J. (2007). The librarian, the machine, or a little of both: A comparative study of three information literacy pedagogies at Oakland University. College and Research Libraries, 68(4), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.4.330
Mao, J. & Kinsley, K. (2017). Embracing the generalized propensity score method: Measuring the effect of library usage on first-time-in-college student academic success. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.18438/B8BH35
O’Kelly, M. K., Jeffryes, J., Hobscheid, M., & Passarelli, R. (2023). Correlation between library instruction and student retention: Methods and implications. College & Research Libraries, 84(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.1.85
Robertshaw, M. B., & Asher, A. (2019). Unethical numbers? A meta-analysis of library learning analytics studies. Library Trends, 68(1), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2019.0031
Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in the observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70 (1). 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
Rowe, J., Leuzinger, J., Hargis, C., & Harker, K. R. (2021). The impact of library instruction on undergraduate student success: A four-year study. College & Research Libraries, 82(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.1.7
Silk, K. J., Perrault, E. K., Ladenson, S., & Nazione, S. A. (2015). The effectiveness of online versus in-person library instruction on finding empirical communication research. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(2), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.12.007
Soria, K., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2017). The impact of academic library resources on undergraduates’ degree completion. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 812-823. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.812
Vossler, J., Horton, J., & Heady, C. (2023). The questionable efficacy of one-shot instruction for first-year students: A scoping review. ACRL 2023 Conference, 446-454, 2023. https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/acrl/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2023/QuestionableEfficacy1.pdf
Wegener, D. R. (2018). Information literacy: Diagnostics, interventions, and assessments. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 47, 102–113. https://www.las.org.sg/wp/sjlim/information-literacy-diagnostics-interventions-and-assessments
Wine, L. D., Pribesh, S., Kimmel, S. C., Dickinson, G., & Church, A. P. (2023). Impact of school librarians on elementary student achievement in reading and mathematics: A propensity score analysis. Library and Information Science Research, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101252
Zhang, L., Watson, E. M., & Banfield, L. (2007). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(4), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.006
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amanda Shannon, Aaron Skira, Chen Ying, Matthew Shreffler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
