The Neuroregenerative Effects of Intraspinal Microstimulation (ISMS) Following Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/eureka28758Keywords:
Rehabilitation Technology, Intraspinal Microstimulation, Mobility Recovery, Rehabilitation Neuroscience, Paraplegia, Spinal Cord InjuryAbstract
Background Intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) is a novel electrical stimulation technique that has demonstrated mobility restoration in animals with spinal cord injury (SCI). This project investigated: 1) the capacity of ISMS to restore functional walking in rats with SCI through 4 weeks of stimulation, and 2) the degree of walking deficit caused by ISMS surgery.
Methods Thirteen Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three groups: 1) rats with hemi-section SCI (hSCI) and no implants (control group), 2) rats with hSCI and passive ISMS implants (ISMS sham group), and 3) rats with hSCI and implants with active electrical stimulation (ISMS group). All groups were trained to walk on a horizontal ladder and their performance was quantified pre- and post-surgery.
Results We hypothesized that the rats with active ISMS implants would demonstrate the greatest improvement in functional walking compared to both control groups, and that the ISMS sham group would underperform the most. The preoperative functional walking scores of control, sham and ISMS rats were 5.7±0.2, 5.5±0.3 and 5.7±0.1, respectively (7-point scale; mean ± standard error). The post-surgery scores were 3.2±0.9, 2.6±0.6 and 3.3±0.8 for control, sham, and ISMS rats, respectively.
Conclusions As the difference between the post-surgery functional walking scores of ISMS and control rats was not statistically significant, this may indicate that four weeks of ISMS stimulation is not enough to cause rehabilitative effects. Additionally, the ISMS sham group demonstrated impaired functional walking compared to the hSCI control group as predicted. Future studies will employ a larger sample size to fully elucidate this trend and utilize thinner microwires to mitigate cellular damage.
Downloads
References
Bamford, J. A., Marc Lebel, R., Parseyan, K., & Mushahwar, V. K. (2017). The fabrication, implantation, and stability of Intraspinal Microwire arrays in the spinal cord of cat and rat. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 25(3), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2016.2555959
Bamford, J. A., & Mushahwar, V. K. (2011). Intraspinal microstimulation for the recovery of function following spinal cord injury. Brain Machine Interfaces: Implications for Science, Clinical Practice and Society, 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53815-4.00004-2
Bamford, J. A., Todd, K. G., & Mushahwar, V. K. (2010). The effects of intraspinal microstimulation on spinal cord tissue in the rat. Biomaterials, 31(21), 5552-5563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.051
Cai, D., Qiu, J., Cao, Z., McAtee, M., Bregman, B. S., & Filbin, M. T. (2001). Neuronal cyclic AMP controls the Developmental loss in ability of axons to regenerate. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(13), 4731-4739. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-13-04731.2001
Chen, Y., Tang, Y., Vogel, L., & DeVivo, M. (2013). Causes of spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 19(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1901-1
Frade, J. M., & Ovejero-Benito, M. C. (2015). Neuronal cell cycle: The neuron itself and its circumstances. Cell Cycle, 14(5), 712–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2015.1004937
Giszter, S. F. (2015). Spinal primitives and intraspinal microstimulation (isms) based prostheses: A neurobiological perspective on the “known unknowns” in isms and future prospects. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00072
Holinski, B. J., Mazurek, K. A., Everaert, D. G., Toossi, A., Lucas-Osma, A. M., Troyk, P., Etienne-Cummings, R., Stein, R. B., Mushahwar, V. K. (2016). Intraspinal microstimulation produces over-ground walking in anesthetized cats. Journal of Neural Engineering, 13(5), 056016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/13/5/056016
Jara, J. S., Agger, S., & Hollis, E. R. (2020). Functional electrical stimulation and the modulation of the axon regeneration program. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00736
Kasten, M. R., Sunshine, M. D., Secrist, E. S., Horner, P. J., & Moritz, C. T. (2013). Therapeutic intraspinal microstimulation improves forelimb function after cervical contusion injury. Journal of Neural Engineering, 10(4), 044001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/044001
Krueger, H., Noonan, V., Trenaman, L., Joshi, P., & Rivers, C. (2013). The economic burden of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada, 33(3), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.33.3.01
Metz, G. A., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2009). The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (28). https://doi.org/10.3791/1204
Moritz, C. T. (2018). Now is the Critical Time for Engineered Neuroplasticity. Neurotherapeutics, 15(3), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-018-0637-0
New, P. W., & Marshall, R. (2013). International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets for non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord World Health Organization, 52(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.160
Zareen, N., Dodson, S., Armada, K., Awad, R., Sultana, N., Hara, E., Alexander, H., Martin, J. H. (2018). Stimulation-dependent remodeling of the corticospinal tract requires reactivation of growth-promoting developmental signaling pathways. Experimental Neurology, 307, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.05.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eureka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By signing the Eureka publication agreement, authors agree to the following:
- The work has not been previously published in any format;
- Eureka is granted the royalty-free right to publish and disseminate the work in current and future formats;
- The work will be published in Eureka under a Creative Commons license. Eureka encourages authors to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to distribute, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the Author(s) for the original creation.
Authors may however choose to have their work distributed under any of the Creative Commons licenses currently available by specifying their preferred license in the publication agreement. A description of the Creative Commons licenses is available here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
- Authors retain their copyright, including the right to subsequently publish or disseminate their work elsewhere, provided that they make reasonable efforts to ensure that the publication in Eureka is acknowledged.
- Authors agree to determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who hold rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third party work”) to be published in connection with your work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or similar license.
- All co-authors and investigators (e.g. faculty supervisors) with claims to the intellectual property have read and signed the agreement, thereby providing their consent for the submission to be published in Eureka.
Unless otherwise specified, authors guarantee that all parts of the submission are the author’s original work. Submissions containing evidence of plagiarism will not be eligible for publication.
