Conceptualization and Practice of Information Literacy Pedagogy at Universities in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30370Abstract
Objective – The aim of this study is to examine the conceptualization and pedagogical approaches being used in Kenyan universities to teach and learn information literacy to determine if they are effective in addressing the information needs of the 21st century. The findings of this study will act as a guide to educational stakeholders in the design, review, and implementation of the information literacy curriculum. The findings will also create awareness among librarians of the diverse concepts in information literacy and hopefully inform their practice when delivering information literacy instruction. Additionally, future researchers can leverage the insights garnered from this study to advance their own works, thereby contributing to the ongoing growth of knowledge in this field.
Methods – This study employed descriptive research design to collect qualitative data from the webpages of seven universities that were purposively selected: three being private universities and four were public universities. The seven academic libraries had an active online presence and adequate documentation of information literacy. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results – The research findings show a lack of consistency in the conceptualization of information literacy. In addition, the findings demonstrate a link between information literacy conceptualization and practice. Many of the online tutorials and information literacy documentations failed to address all the aspects of information literacy.
Conclusion – In order to effectively address 21st century information needs, academic libraries should reevaluate their conceptualization of information literacy. This should be followed by a comprehensive evaluation of their information literacy instruction to ensure they cover all aspects of information literacy. It is essential for these libraries to provide information literacy instruction to students throughout their academic journey rather than just focusing on first-year students. Moreover, structured assessments of students should be implemented to gain feedback on the effectiveness of these instruction programs.
Downloads
References
American Library Association. (1989). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final report. https://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Bruce, C. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy. Auslib Press.
Commission for University Education. (2014). Universities standards and guidelines, 2014. https://www.cue.or.ke/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=category&download=101:universities-standards-and-guidelines-2014&id=16:standards-and-guidelines&Itemid=329
Commission for University Education. (2021). Approved Academic Programmes Offered in Chartered Universities in Kenya in Accordance with The Universities Act. https://www.cue.or.ke/documents/Approved_Academic_Programmes_July2021.pdf
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Ganesan, P., & Gunasekaran, M. (2022). Assessment of information literacy skills and knowledge-based competencies in using electronic resources among medical students. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(4), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2021-0087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2021-0087
Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208574
Julien, H., Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2018). Survey of information literacy instructional practices in U.S. academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 79(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.2.179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.2.179
Leaning, M. (2019). An approach to digital literacy through the integration of media and information literacy. Media and Communication, 7(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1931
Lloyd, A. (2010). Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011023643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011023643
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 3351–33514. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
Nierenberg, E., Låg, T., & Dahl, T. I. (2021). Knowing and doing: The development of information literacy measures to assess knowledge and practice. Journal of Information Literacy, 15(2), 78–123. https://doi.org/10.11645/15.2.2795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11645/15.2.2795
Stebbing, D., Shelley, J., Warnes, M., & McMaster, C. (2019). What academics really think about information literacy. Journal of Information Literacy, 13(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.11645/13.1.2338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11645/13.1.2338
SCONUL Advisory Committee on Information Literacy. (1999). Information skills in higher education. The Society of College, National and University Libraries.
Tewell, E. (2015). A decade of critical information literacy: A review of the literature. Communications in Information Literacy, 9(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.174
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; National Forum on Information Literacy; & International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2005). Beacons of the information society: The Alexandria proclamation on information literacy and lifelong learning. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/3147
Whitworth, A. (2014). Nurturing information landscapes: Networks, information literacy and the need for a critical phenomenography. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014 (pp. 323–330). https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2014/abstracts/whitworth.htm
World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
Zhang, X., Majid, S., & Foo, S. (2010). Environmental scanning: An application of information literacy skills at the workplace. Journal of Information Science, 36(6), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510385644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510385644
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Johnson Mulongo Masinde, Frankline Mugambi, Daniel Muthee Wambiri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
