Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024)

Editor-in-Chief: Ann Medaille; Associate Editor (Evidence Summaries): Heather MacDonald, Fiona Inglis; Associate Editor (Research Articles): Erin Owens, Nikki Tummon; Associate Editor (Reviews): Lisl Zach; Communications Officer (News): Joanne Fitzpatrick; Production Editors: Jamie Hazlitt, Rachel Hinrichs; Editorial Intern: Sara Murphy; Copyeditors: Heather Healy (Lead Copyeditor), Ève Bourbeau-Allard, Kirstin Duffin, Julie Evener, Gina Genova, Emily Kroeker, Maria Tan, Elaina Vitale, Ross Wilson, Delaina Zeinoun

Published: 2024-06-14

Editorial

Evidence Summary Theme: Artificial Intelligence

Heather MacDonald

1
- HTML
- PDF

Research Articles

A Survey on Student Use of Generative AI Chatbots for Academic Research

Amy Deschenes, Meg McMahon

2-22
- HTML
- PDF
Gauging Academic Unit Perceptions of Library Services During a Transition in University Budget Models

Margaret A Hoogland, Gerald Natal, Robert Wilmott, Clare F. Keating, Daisy Caruso

23-50
- HTML
- PDF
Beyond Cost Savings: The Impact of Open Textbooks on Writing Studies Course Grades

Sarah LeMire

51-62
- HTML
- PDF
Conceptualization and Practice of Information Literacy Pedagogy at Universities in Kenya

Johnson Mulongo Masinde, Frankline Mugambi, Daniel Muthee Wambiri

63-73
- HTML
- PDF
“Wellbeing Through Reading”: The Impact of a Public Library and Healthcare Library Partnership Initiative in England

Anita Phul, Hélène Gorring, David Stokes

74-93
- HTML
- PDF
Systematic Review Research Guides and Support Services in Academic Libraries in the US: A Content Analysis of Resources and Services in 2023

Elizabeth Sterner

94-108
- HTML
- PDF

Using Evidence in Practice

Evidence Based Principles to Accelerate Health Information Flow and Uptake Among Older Adults

Nick Ubels, Lauren Albrecht

109-118
- HTML
- PDF
Increasing Student Engagement in a Re-opened Regional Campus Library: Results from a Student Focus Group

Isabel Vargas Ochoa

119-126
- HTML
- PDF

Evidence Summaries

Academic Libraries’ Citation Guides to ChatGPT Show Mixed Levels of Accuracy and Currency

Abbey Lewis

127-129
- HTML
- PDF
Students’ Perspective of the Advantages and Disadvantages of ChatGPT Compared to Reference Librarians

Kathy Grams

130-132
- HTML
- PDF
Machine-learning Recommender Systems Can Inform Collection Development Decisions

Kristy Hancock

133-135
- HTML
- PDF
Academic Libraries Can Develop AI Chatbots for Virtual Reference Services with Minimal Technical Knowledge and Limited Resources

Matthew Chase

136-138
- HTML
- PDF
A Study on the Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence

David Dettman

139-141
- HTML
- PDF
Machine Learning Offers Opportunities to Advance Library Services

Samantha Kaplan

142-144
- HTML
- PDF
ChatGPT not Useful as a Tool to Streamline Library Cataloguing Processes

Andrea Miller-Nesbitt

145-147
- HTML
- PDF

News

Call for Volunteers for EBLIP Journal: Peer Reviewers from Public Libraries

148-149
- HTML
- PDF

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024)

Editorial

Evidence Summary Theme: Artificial Intelligence

Research Articles

A Survey on Student Use of Generative AI Chatbots for Academic Research

Gauging Academic Unit Perceptions of Library Services During a Transition in University Budget Models

Beyond Cost Savings: The Impact of Open Textbooks on Writing Studies Course Grades

Conceptualization and Practice of Information Literacy Pedagogy at Universities in Kenya

“Wellbeing Through Reading”: The Impact of a Public Library and Healthcare Library Partnership Initiative in England

Systematic Review Research Guides and Support Services in Academic Libraries in the US: A Content Analysis of Resources and Services in 2023

Using Evidence in Practice

Evidence Based Principles to Accelerate Health Information Flow and Uptake Among Older Adults

Increasing Student Engagement in a Re-opened Regional Campus Library: Results from a Student Focus Group

Evidence Summaries

Academic Libraries’ Citation Guides to ChatGPT Show Mixed Levels of Accuracy and Currency

Students’ Perspective of the Advantages and Disadvantages of ChatGPT Compared to Reference Librarians

Machine-learning Recommender Systems Can Inform Collection Development Decisions

Academic Libraries Can Develop AI Chatbots for Virtual Reference Services with Minimal Technical Knowledge and Limited Resources

A Study on the Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence

Machine Learning Offers Opportunities to Advance Library Services

ChatGPT not Useful as a Tool to Streamline Library Cataloguing Processes

News

Call for Volunteers for EBLIP Journal: Peer Reviewers from Public Libraries

Current Issue

about

submit