Gauging Academic Unit Perceptions of Library Services During a Transition in University Budget Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30379Abstract
Objective – Beginning in Fiscal Year 2023, a university initiated a multi-year transition to an incentive-based budget model, under which the University Libraries budget would eventually be dependent upon yearly contributions from colleges. Such a change could result in the colleges having a more profound interest in library services and resources. In anticipation of any changes in thoughts and perceptions on existing University Libraries services, researchers crafted a survey for administrators, faculty, and staff focused on academic units related to the health sciences. The collected information would inform library budget decisions with the goal of optimizing support for research and educational interests.
Methods – An acquisitions and collection management librarian, electronic resources librarian, two health science liaisons, and a staff member reviewed and considered distributing validated surveys to health science faculty, staff, and administrators. Ultimately, researchers concluded that a local survey would allow the University Libraries to address health science community needs and gauge use of library services. In late October 2022, the researchers obtained Institutional Review Board approval and distributed the online survey from mid-November to mid-December 2022.
Results – This survey collected 112 responses from health science administrators, faculty, and staff. Many faculty and staff members had used University Libraries services for more than 16 years. By contrast, most administrators started using the library within the past six years. Cost-share agreements intrigued participants as mechanisms for maintaining existing subscriptions or paying for new databases and e-journals. Most participants supported improving immediate access to full-text articles instead of relying on interlibrary loans. Participants desired to build upon existing knowledge of Open Access publishing. Results revealed inefficiencies in how the library communicates changes in collections (e.g., journals, books) and services.
Conclusion – A report of the study findings sent to library administration fulfilled the research aim to inform budget decision making. With the possibility of reduced funds under the new internal budgeting model to both academic programs and the library, the study supports consideration of internal cost-sharing agreements. Findings exposed the lack of awareness of the library’s efforts at decision making transparency, which requires exploration of alternative communication methods. Research findings also revealed awareness of Open Educational Resources and Open Access publishing as areas that deserve heightened promotional efforts from librarians. Finally, this local survey and methodology provides a template for potential use at other institutions.
Downloads
References
Adams, E. M. (1997). Rationality in the academy: Why responsibility center budgeting is a wrong step down the wrong road. Change, 29, 58-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091389709602338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389709602338
Agostino, D. (1993). The impact of responsibility center management on communications departments. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 22(1), 23 –26. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/jaca/vol22/iss1/4/
Allen, N. (2018). 1 billion in savings through open educational resources. SPARC News. https://sparcopen.org/news/2018/1-billion-in-savings-through-open-educational-resources/
Allen, L., Baker, N., Wilson, J., Creamer, K., & Consiglio, D. (2013). Analyzing the MISO data: Broader perspectives on library and computing trends. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 8(2), 129–138. https://dx.doi.org/10.18438/B82G7V DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B82G7V
Baker, N., Furlong, K., Consiglio, D., Holbert, G.L., Milberg, C., Reynolds, K., & Wilson, J. (2018). Demonstrating the value of “library as place” with the MISO survey. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 19(2), 111–120. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PMM-01-2018-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-01-2018-0004
Bakker, C.J. An Introduction to Statistics for Librarians (Part One): Types of Data. Hypothesis: Research Journal for Health Information Professionals, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.18060/26428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/26428
Bliss, T. J., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972
Bradley, K., Shaw, D. R., Lee, B., Symons, J., & Hernandez, G. (2023). eBooks: A novel approach to education and training offering savings and resources. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 54(9), 394–397. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20230816-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20230816-04
Bridgeman M. (2021). The Rutgers University Libraries Open and Affordable Textbook (OAT) Program. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 40(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2021.1945864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2021.1945864
Burk-Rafel, J., Santen, S. A., & Purkiss, J. (2017). Study behaviors and USMLE Step 1 performance: Implications of a student self-directed parallel curriculum. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 92(11S), Association of American Medical Colleges, Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions), S67–S74. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001916
Carlson, S. (2015). Colleges 'unleash the deans' with decentralized budgets. Chronicle of Higher Education, 61(22), A4-A6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1556-3499(15)00020-0
Cuillier, C., & Stoffle, C. J. (2011). Finding alternative sources of revenue. Journal of Library Administration, 51(7-8), 777-809. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.601276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.601276
Curry, J. R., Laws, A. L., & Strauss, J. C. (2013). Responsibility Center Management: A guide to balancing academic entrepreneurship with fiscal responsibility. National Association of College and University Business Officers.
Deering, D., & Lang, D. W. (2017). Responsibility center budgeting and management "lite" in university finance. Planning for Higher Education, 45(3), 94-109.
Deering, D., & Sá, C. (2018). Do corporate management tools inevitably corrupt the soul of the university? Evidence from the implementation of responsibility center budgeting. Tertiary Education & Management, 24(2), 115-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1398779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1398779
De Groote, S. L., Aksu Dunya, B., Scoulas, J. M., & Case, M. M. (2020). Research productivity and its relationship to library collections. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(4), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29736
DeLancey, L., & deVries, S. (2023). The impact of Responsibility Center Management on academic libraries: An exploratory study. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 23(1), 7-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.0005
Delimont N., Turtle E. C., Bennett A., Adhikari K., & Lindshield B. L. (2016). University students and faculty have positive perceptions of open/alternative resources and their utilization in a textbook replacement initiative. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 29920. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29920
Engelbrecht, J. (2004). The changing of the guard, or: Moving from print to "e" with a new financial model. IATUL Annual Conference Proceedings, 14, 1.
Everall, K., & Logan, J. (2017). A mixed methods approach to iterative service design of an in-person reference service point. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4), 178–185. https://dx.doi.org/10.18438/B87Q2X DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B87Q2X
Fethke, G. C., & Policano, A. J. (2019, 01/01/). Centralized (CAM) versus decentralized budgeting (RCM) approaches in implementing public university strategy. Journal of Education Finance, 45(2), 172-197.
Fonseca, C. (2019). Amplify your impact: The insta-story: A new frontier for marking and engagement at the Sonoma state university library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(4), 219. https://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.4.7148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.4.7148
Giannopoulos, E., Snow, M., Manley, M., McEwan, K., Stechkevich, A., Giuliani, M. E., & Papadakos, J. (2021). Identifying gaps in consumer health library collections: A retrospective review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(4), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.895
Gorring, H., Duffy, D., Forde, A., Irving, D., Morgan, K., & Nicholas, K. (2023). How research into healthcare staff use and non-use of e-books led to planning a joint approach to e-book policy and practice across UK and Ireland healthcare libraries. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 40(1), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12469
Hearn, J. C., Lewis, D. R., Kallsen, L., Holdsworth, J. M., & Jones, L. M. (2006). "Incentives for managed growth": A case study of incentives-based planning and budgeting in a large public research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 286-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778927
Hill, K. (2015). Usage of social media in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill health science library: A case study. UNC Chapel Hill Theses, MP4205.
Hulbert, I. G. (2023, March 30). US Library Survey 2022: Navigating the New Normal. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.318642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.318642
Huron Consulting Group. (2021). Huron Consulting report to the deans. https://utaaup.com/huron-consulting-report-to-the-deans/
Jaquette, O., Kramer, D. A., & Curs, B. R. (2018). Growing the pie? The effect of responsibility center management on tuition revenue. Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 637-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1434276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1434276
Kent State University. (n.d.). Comparative RCM models. Retrieved May 7 from https://www.kent.edu/budget/comparative-rcm-models
Kirschner, J., Monnin, J., & Andresen, C. (2023). Gaining ground: OER at 3 health sciences institutions. Hypothesis: Research Journal for Health Information Professionals, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.18060/27410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/27410
Klein-Fedyshin, M., & Ketchum, A. M. (2023). PubMed's core clinical journals filter: Redesigned for contemporary clinical impact and utility. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 111(3), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1631
Lierman, A. (2021). Textbook alternative incentive programs at U.S. universities: A review of the literature. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(4), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29758
Linn, M. (2007). Budget systems used in allocating resources to libraries. Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 20(1), 20-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08880450710747425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08880450710747425
Lopez, E., Bass, M.B., Danquah, L.E. (2022). Trends in…medical library essential services. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 41(1), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2022.2021039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2022.2021039
Myers, G. M. (2019). Responsibility center budgeting as a mechanism to deal with academic moral hazard. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(3), 13-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v49i3.188491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v49i3.188491
Neal, J. G., & Smith, L. (1995). Responsibility center management and the university library. The Bottom Line, 8(4), 17-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025455
O’Hanlon, R. & Laynor, G. (2019). Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education [commentary]. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(2), 251-257. https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619
Priest, D., Becker, W., Hossler, D., & St. John, E. (2002). Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035304868
Riggs, D. E. (1997). What's in store for academic libraries? Leadership and management issues. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23(1), 3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(97)90065-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(97)90065-3
Rogers, C. (2009). There is always tomorrow? Libraries on the edge. Journal of Library Administration, 49(5), 545-558. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930820903090938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820903090938
Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T. (2018). Does the motivation for market‐based reform matter? The case of responsibility‐centered management. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 626-639. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12884
Rutner, J. & Self, J. (2013). Still bound for disappointment? Another look at faculty and library journal collections. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 8(2), 114-128. https://dx.doi.org/10.18438/B8XS5Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B8XS5Z
Scoulas, J.M., & De Groote, S., L. (2020). University students’ changing library needs and use: A comparison of 2016 and 2018 surveys. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(1), 59-89. https://dx.doi.org/10.18438/eblip29621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29621
Shultz, M., & Berryman, D.R. (2020). Collection practices for nontraditional online resources among academic health sciences libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(2), 253-261. https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.791
Sugrim S., Schimming L., & Halevi, G. (2019). Identifying e-books authored by faculty: A method for scoping the digital collection and curating a list. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(1), 103-107. https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.514
Tackett S., Slinn K., Marshall T., Gaglani, S., Waldman, V., & Desai R. (2018). Medical education videos for the world: An analysis of viewing patterns for a YouTube channel. Academic Medicine, 93(8), 1150-1156. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002118
Watson, C. E., Domizi, D. P., & Clouser, S. A. (2017). Student and faculty perceptions of OpenStax in high enrollment courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2462
Whalen, E. L. (1991). Responsibility center budgeting: An approach to decentralized management for institutions of higher education. Indiana University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Margaret A Hoogland, Gerald Natal, Robert Wilmott, Clare F. Keating, Daisy Caruso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
