Organizational Readiness to Adopt Artificial Intelligence in the Library and Information Sector of Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30408Abstract
Objective – This study investigates the readiness for artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in library and information centres of Pakistani universities. The projected outcomes of this study are expected to contribute to the development of best practices for effectively motivating university administrators and preparing librarians for adopting AI in library and information centres.
Methods – A theoretical framework combining the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework and the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) guided this qualitative study. Interviews were conducted with 27 senior representatives, including library managers and registrars, from 27 universities across four provinces and the capital city, Islamabad. A systematic approach was employed to analyze the data.
Results – The findings indicate that the concept of AI adoption in Pakistani university libraries is new. The library and information sector of Pakistan is slow in adopting AI, which could have implications for its future competitiveness, despite the push for AI adoption by university librarians and administrators. The readiness for AI adoption in this sector is influenced by factors such as organizational technological practices, financial resources, university size, and data management and protection concerns.
Conclusion – Library managers and researchers can implement the TOE framework and TRI scale to facilitate AI adoption in a manner that is relevant to library and information settings in Pakistan as well as other parts of the world. Our research indicates that most adoptions are still in their nascent phases, and numerous library managers feel uneasy due to either uncertainties about the precise benefits AI can bring to their libraries or a lack of knowledge and skills for its effective implementation. To manage the networks of internal and external stakeholders essential for successful AI adoption, universities should consider appointing individuals with a specialized knowledge of AI within their libraries.
Downloads
References
Aboelmaged, M., Mouakket, S., & Ali, I. (in press). A scientometric analysis of digital library adoption over the past 30 years: Models, trends, and research directions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231161143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231161143
Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002
Ahmad, H., Butt, A. H., Khan, A., Shafique, M. N., & Nawaz, Z. (2020). Reluctance to acceptance: Factors affecting e-payment adoption in Pakistan (The integration of TRI and TAM). SMART Journal of Business Management Studies, 16(2), 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2321-2012.2020.00016.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-2012.2020.00016.0
Andrews, J. E., Ward, H., & Yoon, J. (2021). UTAUT as a model for understanding intention to adopt AI and related technologies among librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6), Article 102437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102437
Asemi, A., & Asemi, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence (AI) application in library systems in Iran: A taxonomy study. Library Philosophy and Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1840
Asemi, A., Ko, A., & Nowkarizi, M. (2021). Intelligent libraries: A review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robot. Library Hi Tech, 39(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-02-2020-0038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2020-0038
Baharuddin, M. F., Izhar, T. A. T., & Shoid, M. S. M. (2018). Adoption of open source software (OSS) and organization performance in the library. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i9/4591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4591
Bello, O., & Zeadally, S. (2019). Toward efficient smartification of the Internet of Things (IoT) services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.09.083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.09.083
Bhattacherjee, A., & Hikmet, N. (2008). Reconceptualizing organizational support and its effect on information technology usage: Evidence from the health care sector. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 69-76. https://doi/abs/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646036
Bolt, N. (2014). Libraries from now on: Imagining the future of libraries: ALA Summit on the Future of Libraries – Report to ALA membership. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/tools/sites/ala.org.tools/files/content/LibraryoftheFuture/LibrariesFromNowOn_ALASummitOnTheFutureofLibraries_FinalReport.pdf
Bourg, C. (2017, March 16). What happens to libraries and librarians when machines can read all the books? Feral Librarian. https://chrisbourg.wordpress.com/2017/03/16/what-happens-to-libraries-and-librarians-when-machines-can-read-all-the-books/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Brown, T. (2021). The future of events will be hybrid. In V. Ziakas, V. Antchak, & D. Getz (Eds.), Crisis management and recovery for events: Impacts and strategies (pp. 142–164). Goodfellow Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/9781911635901-4815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23912/9781911635901-4815
Chaubey, A., & Sahoo, C. K. (2021). Assimilation of business intelligence: The effect of external pressures and top leaders commitment during pandemic crisis. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102344
Chen, J., Smadi, D., Zhang, X., & Xie, Z. (2018, March 25–28). An investigation of cyberinfrastructure adoption in university libraries [Poster presentation]. iConference 2018, Sheffield, England, UK. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/106330
Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., & Mikalef, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60, Article 102383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383
Cox, A. (2023). How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies literature and the theory of the professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635
Cox, A. M., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2019). The intelligent library: Thought leaders' views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105
Crawford, S., & Syme, F. (2018). Enhancing collection development with big data analytics. Public Library Quarterly, 37(4), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1514922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1514922
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
Dewi, M. A. A., Hidayanto, A. N., Purwandari, B., Kosandi, M., & Budi, N. F. A. (2018). Smart city readiness model based on technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework and its effect on adoption decision. In M. Tanabu & D. Senoo (Eds.), Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2018 proceedings. Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/268/
Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds.). (2020). The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519
Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., Bello, A. O., Inegbedion, H., Nwanji, T., & Asamu, F. (2019). Mobile marketing technology adoption in service SMEs: A multi-perspective framework. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-11-2018-0105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-11-2018-0105
Gholami, Z., Abdekhoda, M., & Gavgani, V. Z. (2018). Determinant factors in adopting mobile technology-based services by academic librarians. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 38(4), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.4.12676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.4.12676
Gitonga, F. N., Gichohi, P. M., & Gichoya, D. (2023). Technology responsive measures adopted by university libraries in Meru County, Kenya in addressing disruptive forces. International Journal of Professional Practice, 11(4), 52–62. https://ijpp.kemu.ac.ke/ijpp/index.php/ijpp/article/view/341
Harisanty, D., Anna, N. E. V., Putri, T. E., Firdaus, A. A., & Noor Azizi, N. A. (in press). Leaders, practitioners and scientists' awareness of artificial intelligence in libraries: A pilot study. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-10-2021-0356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2021-0356
Hradecky, D., Kennell, J., Cai, W., & Davidson, R. (2022). Organizational readiness to adopt artificial intelligence in the exhibition sector in Western Europe. International Journal of Information Management, 65, Article 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102497
Hoopes, A. J., Gilmore, K., Cady, J., Akers, A. Y., & Ahrens, K. R. (2016). A qualitative study of factors that influence contraceptive choice among adolescent school-based health center patients. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 29(3), 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.011
Jiang, Y., & Johnston, C. (2010). Parents' dilemmas in choosing empirically supported treatments for child ADHD. The ADHD Report, 18(4), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1521/adhd.2010.18.4.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/adhd.2010.18.4.5
Kalema, B. M., & Mokgadi, M. (2017). Developing countries organizations' readiness for big data analytics. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(1), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.13
Lengoatha, L., & Seymour, L. F. (2020). Determinant factors of intention to adopt blockchain technology across academic libraries. In Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT) '20 (pp. 244–250). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410886.3410905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3410886.3410905
Lewis, M., Sycara, K., & Walker, P. (2018). The role of trust in human-robot interaction. In H. A. Abbass, J. Scholz, & D. J. Reid (Eds.), Foundations of trusted autonomy (pp. 135–159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_8
Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Xu, D. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information & Management, 56(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209281
Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
Matta, V., Koonce, D., & Jeyaraj, A. (2012). Initiation, experimentation, implementation of innovations: The case for Radio Frequency Identification systems. International Journal of Information Management, 32(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.10.002
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
Mogali, S. S. (2014, February). Artificial intelligence and its applications in libraries [Paper presentation]. Bilingual International Conference on Information Technology: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, Delhi, India. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287878456_Artificial_Intelligence_and_its_applications_in_Libraries
Motau, M., & Kalema, B. M. (2016). Big data analytics readiness: A South African public sector perspective. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech) (pp. 265–271). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EmergiTech.2016.7737350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EmergiTech.2016.7737350
Mustafa, A., & Noorhidawati, A. (2020). Adoption and implementation of evidence-based library acquisition of electronic resources. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 25(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no1.1
Okunlaya, R. O., Syed Abdullah, N., & Alias, R. A. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1869–1892. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-07-2021-0242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0242
Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejise/article/view/389
Omame, I. M., & Alex-Nmecha, J. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in libraries. In N. E. Osuigwe (Ed.), Managing and adapting library information services for future users (pp. 120–144). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1116-9.ch008
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, 27(4), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00071-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00071-1
Salman, M. S., Sani, M. K. J. A., & Sahid, N. Z. (2022). Assessing the big data analytics readiness based on technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework of Malaysian libraries: Descriptive analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 1465–1484. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i2/13903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/13903
Singeh, F. W., Abrizah, A., & Kiran, K. (2020). Bringing the digital library success factors into the realm of the technology-organization-environment framework. The Electronic Library, 38(3), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-08-2019-0187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2019-0187
Soares, A. L. V., Mendes-Filho, L., & Gretzel, U. (2021). Technology adoption in hotels: Applying institutional theory to tourism. Tourism Review, 76(3), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-05-2019-0153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-05-2019-0153
Sox, C. B., Crews, T. B., & Kline, S. F. (2014). Virtual and hybrid meetings for Generation X: Using the Delphi method to determine best practices, opportunities, and barriers. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, (15)2, 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2014.896231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2014.896231
Sözüer, A., & Pınar, İ. (2016). Teknoloji-organizasyon-çevre modeli perspektifinden kütüphane 2.0 [Library 2.0 through the perspective of technology-organization-environment framework]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği [Turkish Librarianship], 30(1), 20–32. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tk/issue/48657/618821
Tella, A. (in press). Adoption of a quadratic usage framework for predicting blockchain use intention from the perspective of librarians in Southwest Nigerian universities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231173690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231173690
Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 153–169). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n11
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC medical research methodology, 18, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
Vijayakumar, S., & Sheshadri, K. N. (2019). Applications of artificial intelligence in academic libraries. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 7(16), 136–140. https://www.ijcseonline.org/pdf_spl_paper_view.php?paper_id=1294&26-IJCSE-NCCC-2019-69.pdf
Wang, Y., Meister, D., & Wang, Y. (2008). Relative advantage and perceived usefulness: The adoption of competing ICTs. In Diffusion Interest Group in Information Technology (DIGIT) 2008 proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2008/6/
Wang, Y.-S., Li, H.-T., Li, C.-R., & Zhang, D.-Z. (2016). Factors affecting hotels' adoption of mobile reservation systems: A technology-organization-environment framework. Tourism Management, 53, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.021
Wiese, M., & Humbani, M. (2020). Exploring technology readiness for mobile payment app users. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 30(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2019.1626260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2019.1626260
Wynn, E., & Hult, H. V. (2019). Qualitative and critical research in information systems and human-computer interaction: Divergent and convergent paths. Now Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680835571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680835571
Yakubu, A. S., Kassim, A. M., & Husin, M. H. (2023). Conceptualizing hybrid model for influencing intention to adopt cloud computing in North-Eastern Nigerian academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), Article 102747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102747
Yoon, J., Andrews, J. E., & Ward, H. L. (2022). Perceptions on adopting artificial intelligence and related technologies in libraries: Public and academic librarians in North America. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1893–1915. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-07-2021-0229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0229
Zhao, Y., Deng, S., Gao, T., & Zhou, R. (2016). Research on user needs for mobile information services in Chinese university libraries: Comparison between existing user and potential users. The Electronic Library, 34(4), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-12-2014-0222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2014-0222
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 saeed Jan, Saeed, Sajjad, Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
