Assessment of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship, Phase 2: Impact on the Research Productivity and Careers of Academic Librarians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30461Abstract
Objective – This article reports on the qualitative phase of a two-phase sequential mixed-methods study to assess the first six years of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship (IRDL), a continuing education program for academic and research librarians. The study is designed to assess the effectiveness of IRDL in meeting short-term and long-term programmatic objectives related to the research productivity, job performance, and professional identities of the participants in the program.
Methods – In this second part of a two-phase study, the authors conducted focus group and individual interviews with 37 IRDL participants (hereafter called Scholars) and coded the resulting transcripts. The first phase of the study surveyed all 124 program participants; the results were reported in an earlier article in this journal. The second-phase interviews were conducted and then coded using a deductive process. The researchers identified transcript excerpts that explored the concepts of research productivity, job performance, and identity as a researcher. Each of these concepts was further sub-coded to explore the four sources of self-efficacy, as described in Albert Bandura’s theory: mastery experiences; verbal or social persuasion; vicarious experiences; and physiological and affective states.
Results – The majority of the conversations in both the in-depth individual interviews and the focus group interviews centered around research productivity; approximately 70% of the transcript excerpts from focus groups and 55% of the individual interviews addressed issues related to productivity. Participants also discussed the impact of IRDL on their job performance and their identify as researchers. Gaining research confidence had a notable positive impact on job performance related to classroom teaching and supporting researchers. Within these areas of conversation, all sources of self-efficacy were evident, but the most frequently noted were influences related to mastery learning and social persuasion, through mentorship and becoming part of a peer research community.
Conclusion – The findings from the focus groups and in-depth interviews deepen the meaning of the results from the quantitative phase of our IRDL assessment research. The participants in the study reported both frustration and satisfaction with conducting their research. A supportive environment focused on helping librarians gain needed research skills, practice those skills, and become part of a research community contributes to research confidence and productivity, improved job performance, and identity as a researcher. The findings of this study have implications for developing librarians as researchers, including the importance of a supportive work environment, research mentoring, and the positive influence of becoming part of a research community.
Downloads
References
Ackerman, E., Hunter, J., & Wilkinson, Z. T. (2818). The availability and effectiveness of research supports for early career academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(5), 553-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.06.001
Albarillo, F., Kennedy, M.R., & Brancolini, K.R. (2022). Assessment of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship (IRDL): Impact on the research productivity and careers of academic librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(4), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30094
Bakken, L.L., Byars-Winston, A., & Wang, M. (2006). Viewing clinical research career development through the lens of Social Cognitive Career Theory. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 11(1), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-3138-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-3138-y
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. (1998). Text analysis: Qualitative and quantitative methods. In: H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 595-646). AltaMira Press.
Betz, N. E. (1986). Research training in counseling psychology: Have we addressed the real issues? The Counseling Psychologist, 14(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000086141007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000086141007
Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. (1996). The utility of the research self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400104
Brancolini, K. R., & Kennedy, M. R. Kennedy. (2017). The development and use of a research self-efficacy scale to assess the effectiveness of a research training program for academic Librarians.” Library and Information Research, 41(124), 44-84. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg760
Brew, A., Boud, D., Namgung, S. U., Lucas, L., & Crawford, K. (2016). Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research. Higher Education, 71, 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734‐015‐9930‐6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9930-6
Brown, S. D., Lent, R.W., Ryan, N. E., & McPartland, E. B. (1996). Self-efficacy as in intervening mechanism between research training environments and productivity: A theoretical and methodological extension. The Counseling Psychologist, 24(3), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000096243012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000096243012
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2023, April 09. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker
Forester, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703257719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703257719
Guest, G., & MacQueen, K. M. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook for team based qualitative research. AltaMira Press.
Hoffmann, K., Berg., S. A., Brancolini, K. R., & Kennedy, M. R. (2023). Complex and varied: Factors related to the research productivity of academic librarians in the United States. College & Research Libraries, 84(3), 392-427. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.3.392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.3.392
Hoffmann, K., Berg, S. A., & Koufogiannakis, D. (2014). Examining success: Identifying factors that contribute to research productivity across librarianship and other disciplines,” Library and Information Research, 38(119), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg639
Hoffmann, K., Berg, S. A., & Koufogiannakis, D (2017). Understanding factors that encourage research productivity in academic librarians,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4), 102–28. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8G66F DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B8G66F
Hollingsworth, M. A., & Fassinger, R. E. (2002). The role of faculty mentors in the research training of counseling psychology doctoral students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(3), 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.3.324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.49.3.324
Jason, D.P., III, Kennedy, M. R., & Brancolini, K. R. (2021). Mentoring academic librarians for research success, in L. J. Rod-Welch and B.E. Weeg (Eds.). Academic Library Mentoring: Fostering Growth and Renewal (pp. 241-262). Chicago, Illinois: Association of College and Research Libraries. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/librarian_pubs/140/
Kahn, J. H., & Scott, N. A. (1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(1), 38-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097251005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097251005
Kennedy, M. R., & Brancolini, K. R. (2012). Academic librarian research: A survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. College & Research Libraries, 73(5), 431-448. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-276
Livinƫi, R., Gunnesch-Luca, G., & Iliescu, D. (2021). Research self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1886103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1886103
Phillips, J. C., & Russell, R. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22(4), 628-641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000094224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000094224008
Rajagopal, K., Joosten–ten Brinke, D., Van Bruggen, J., & Sloep, P. (2012). Understanding personal learning networks: their structure, content and the networking skills needed to optimally use them. First Monday 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i1.3559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i1.3559
Smigielski, E. M., Laning, M. A., & Daniels, C. M. (2014). Funding, time, and mentoring: A study of research and publication support practices of ARL member libraries. Journal of Library Administration 54(4), 261-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.924309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.924309
SocioCultural Research Consultants. (2023). Dedoose Version 9.0.86. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488
Weinberg, R., Gould, D., & Jackson, A. (1979). Expectations and performance: An empirical test of Bandura's self-efficacy theory. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(4), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.1.4.320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.1.4.320
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Frans Albarillo, Marie, Kristine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
