Engagement Practices of Canadian Academic Libraries for the Advancement of Student Voices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30735Abstract
Objective – Student engagement is an integral part of the mission and function of academic libraries, with powerful potential to impact decision-making across various facets of governance, operations, services, and space design. Despite its importance, however, “student engagement” is a broad and highly contested term, even within the domain of libraries. While recent efforts have been made to categorize the concept of “student engagement” in this context and numerous case studies exist to highlight individual libraries’ efforts, successes, and challenges, there is a lack of existing studies involving a cohesive exploration across Canadian academic libraries. In response to this gap, this research details a national-level investigation of how academic libraries in Canada are approaching student engagement, with specific attention towards use of student voices as a feedback mechanism for decision-making.
Methods – Using a combination of a national virtual survey and semi-structured interviews/focus groups with library employees, this study explores specific engagement strategies and processes used by academic libraries, as well as the perceived challenges and benefits of this work.
Results – Sample findings indicate that, while library staff are generally enthusiastic about engagement and voice-seeking work, limited time, resources, and complex organizational cultures can limit activities and alienate students. Despite challenges, participants highlighted numerous benefits, including increased proximity and relevance to students, upholding of the key mission and goals of academic libraries, enhanced quality assessment and improvement of library operations through evidence based decision-making, and bolstered ability to pursue authentic equity, diversity, inclusion, and accessibility (EDIA) commitments. Feedback mechanisms, student employment, and teaching and learning interactions were the most reported strategies for engagement, though opportunities for other engagement domains remain.
Conclusion – Implications of these findings are discussed in the broader context of library and information science and student engagement literature, followed by recommendations for academic libraries to take action via the integration of user-centred library cultures and co-developed communities/partnerships on campus.
Downloads
References
Appleton, L. (2018). Qualitative methods for engaging students in performance measurement. Information and Learning Science, 119(1/2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-09-2017-0093
Appleton, L. (2020). Academic libraries and student engagement: A literature review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 26(2–4), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784762
Ball, H. F., & Fuchs, C. (2024). Engaging to empower: Honouring student sentiment and voices to implement a holistic approach in creating an inclusive and anti-racist library. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 30(2–3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2024.2381516
Barham, R., Keshmiripour, S., Ramin, L., & Venner, M. A. (2018). Student library advisory boards: Engaging students in the library experience and communicating the library's value. In P. Keeran & C. Forbes (Eds.), Successful campus outreach for academic libraries: Building community through collaboration (pp. 185–202). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bastone, Z., & Clement, K. (2022). Serving everyone or serving no one? Examining the faux-equity of the one-shot. College & Research Libraries, 83(5), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.5.780
Black, E. L. (2020). Library student employment and educational value beyond the paycheck. In S. Vong & M. Vrkljan (Eds.), Learning beyond the classroom: Engaging students in information literacy through co-curricular activities (pp. 57–73). Association of College and Research Libraries
Blake, J. R. S., Aston, S., & Grayson, N. (2020). From the outside in: Bringing student engagement to the centre. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 26(2–4), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1777172
Bramley, C., & Morrison, K. (2022). Student engagement, higher education, and social justice: Beyond neoliberalism and the market. Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Browndorf, M. (2014). Student library ownership and building the communicative commons. Journal of Library Administration, 54(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.903364
Bruce, S. (2020, February 6). Teaching with care: A relational approach to individual research consultations. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/teaching-with-care/
Cady, J. E., Beavers, K., Jiang, A., & McCoy, L. (2023). Developing a meaningful student employment experience for students’ success on campus. (2023). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 29(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2122852
Ciszek, M. P. (2020). Moving from diversity to equity and inclusion with social justice as the goal: A new framework for an expansive definition of diversity. In C. Bombaro (Ed.), Diversity, equity, and inclusion in action: Planning, leadership, and programming (pp.1–12). American Library Association.
Colby, K., & Gruber, A. M. (2025). A textbook equity student advisory board. Journal of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education, 3(1), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.31274/joerhe.17910
Cornelius-Bell, A., Bell, P. A., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Deterritorialising student voice and partnership in higher education. Higher Education, 86(6), 1293–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00972-z
Decker, E. N. (2020). Engaging students in academic library design: Emergent practices in co-design. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 26(2–4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1761409
Dollinger, M., Salisbury, F., & Davis, K. (2023). Unrealised potential: A survey of students as partners in Australian university libraries. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 29(3), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2138477
Donald, R. (2024). “Helping people be human”: Academic librarians and a pedagogy of care (Publication No. 31240962) [Doctoral dissertation, Trinity International University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Eshbach, B. E. (2020). Supporting and engaging students through academic library programming. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(3), 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102129
Ferretti, J. A. (2020). Building a critical culture: How critical librarianship falls short in the workplace. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.1.10
Fundator, R., LeGrand, S., Permenter, S., & Weiss, B. (2024). Students as partners in the library: Perspectives of partnering to develop a new information literacy undergraduate research program. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5725
Greer, K. S. (2023). A pedagogy of care for information literacy and metaliteracy asynchronous online instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(3), 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102676
Gullikson, S. (2020). Structuring and supporting UX work in academic libraries. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0003.202
Gupta, A., Liu, Y., Lin, T-C., Zhong, Q., & Suzuki, T. (2024). Listening to diverse voices: Inclusive pedagogy and culturally responsive teaching for library interactions. Reference Services Review, 52(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-04-2023-0042
Hall, A. R. (2022). Towards a modern, inclusive library advisory board. In Proceedings of the 2022 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment (pp. 1–3). https://www.libraryassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/182-Hall-Towards-a-Modern-Inclusive-Library.pdf
Halliday, K., Courage, K., Matthews, C., & Globerson, N. (2024). Decolonising and diversifying the Library through student partnerships. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 30(2/3), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2023.2287470
Holmes-Price, O., Kannegiser, S., Pitsker, E., & Wilkinson, Z. T. (2022). Small actions, big impact: Centering student voices and advocacy with a library student advisory board. College & Research Libraries News, 83(3), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.83.3.105
International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO Standard No. 9241-210:2019). https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html
Islam, A., Agarwal, N. K., & Ikeda, M. (2015). How do academic libraries work with their users to co-create value for service innovation? A qualitative survey. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(3), 637–658. https://qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/274
Kohler, J. P. (2016). Training engaged student employees: A small college library experience. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 23(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2015.1049316
Lindsay, B. D., & Datig, I. (2015). Friends with benefits: Fostering community in an academic library with a student advisory group. In S. Bonnand & M. A. Hansen (Eds.), Innovative solutions for building community in academic libraries (pp. 56-72). IGI Global.
Lindsay, B. D., Datig, I., Johnston, L., & Lupold, A. (2016). Optimizing library services--SAGs to the rescue: Student advisory groups in the library. Against the Grain, 28(1), 56–57. https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.7287
Lowe, T. (2023). Advancing student engagement in higher education. In T. Lowe (Ed.), Advancing student engagement in higher education: Reflection, critique and challenge (pp. 1–17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003271789
Matthews, K. E., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Student voice in higher education: The importance of distinguishing student representation and student partnership. Higher Education, 85(3), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00851-7
Matthews, K. E., Lodge, J. M., & Johnstone, M. (2024). The relational turn in student engagement. In C. Stone & S. O’Shea (Eds.), Research handbook on student engagement in higher education (pp. 28–38). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035314294.00012
Mitola, R., Rinto, E., & Pattni, E. (2018). Student employment as a high-impact practice in academic libraries: A systematic review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.005
Moreno, T. H. (2024). Centering justice/decentering whiteness: The case for abolition in information literacy pedagogical praxis. Reference Services Review, 52(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-03-2023-0028
Novosel, E. (2023). Let’s talk about disability: Disability justice in engineering librarianship. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 43456. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43456
Pittaway, S. (2016). Engaging students, shaping services: The changing face of student engagement at The Hive. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 29(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.315
Salisbury, F., Dollinger, M., & Vanderlelie, J. (2020). Students as partners in the academic library: Co-designing for transformation. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 26(2–4), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1780275
Saunders, L. (2017). Connecting information literacy and social justice: Why and how. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(1), 55–75.
Schlak, T. (2018). Academic libraries and engagement: A critical contextualization of the library discourse on engagement. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.005
Sexton, M. (2022). Convenience sampling and student workers: Ethical and methodological considerations for academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(4), 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102539
Tomlinson, C., & Arnold-Garza, S. (2022). Library employment practices that support student engagement. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(3), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0027
Whitver, S. M. (2020). Accessible library instruction in practice. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 20(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0019
Yazdani, N. (2024). A pedagogy of care in academic libraries: A framework to increase underrepresented communities’ sense of belonging and engagement. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 73(4), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2024.2391224
Young, S. W. H., Chao, Z., & Chandler, A. (2020). User experience methods and maturity in academic libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i1.11787
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarah Guay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
