Student Comprehension of Primary Literature is Aided by Companion Assignments Emphasizing Pattern Recognition and Information Literacy.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1541Abstract
Primary literature is our main mode of communication in the sciences. As such, it is important for our undergraduates in the discipline to learn how to read primary literature. Incorporating primary literature into undergraduate science courses is often difficult because students are unprepared to comprehend primary articles. Learning to read and evaluate primary literature can improve students' understanding of science and the scientific method, and develop the educational and life skill of evaluating whether assertions are supported by evidence. We integrated two areas of research (teaching students to use primary literature and pattern recognition in experts versus novices) to modify a curriculum used to teach information literacy and primary literature in an introductory biology course. The modifications taught students to recognize information by the communication patterns used in the literature, and despite literature's jargon. One section of this course used our modified curriculum while two control sections used the original curriculum. In all sections, students were asked to write a lab report citing a primary literature article pertinent to their laboratory experiment. We read each lab report and the article it cited, ranking the student's comprehension of the article and their ability to integrate the article into their laboratory report on a scale of 1 to 3 using rubrics. While citing a primary literature article was required of all students, more students using the modified curriculum cited primary articles in their laboratory reports (95% vs. 65% average in control sections). The comprehension of primary articles also appeared better, as cited articles were more likely to be correctly paraphrased by students with the modified curriculum (average score of 2.33 vs. 1.96), while there did not appear to be a difference between the groups' abilities to integrate the article into their report. This indicates that by incorporating pattern recognition assignments and information literacy instruction into the curriculum, teachers can significantly improve student comprehension of primary literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Downloads
References
ACRL. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. [Internet]. [Cited December 15, 2011]. Available from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
Bransford, J.D. et al. (eds). 2000. How People Learn. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Brill, G. & Yarden, A. 2003. Learning biology through research papers: a stimulus for question-asking by high-school students. Cell Biol Education 2:266-274
Gehring, K.M. & Eastman, D.A. 2008. Information fluency for undergraduate biology majors: applications of inquiry-based learning in a developmental biology course. CBE - Life Sciences Education 7:54-63.
Petzold, J., et al. 2010. Science Seeker: a new model for teaching information literacy to entry-level biology undergraduates. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 63 [Internet]. [Cited December 15, 2011]. Available from: http://www.istl.org/10-fall/refereed2.html
Winterman, B. 2009. Building better biology undergraduates through information literacy integration. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 58. [Internet]. [Cited December 15, 2011]. Available from: http://www.istl.org/09-summer/refereed1.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.