Scholar<i>ish</i>: Google Scholar and its Value to the Sciences

Authors

  • Jerry E. Gray
  • Michelle C. Hamilton
  • Alexandra Hauser
  • Margaret M. Janz
  • Justin P. Peters
  • Fiona Taggart

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1559

Abstract

In scientific and academic circles, the value of Google Scholar as an information resource has received much scrutiny. Numerous articles have examined its search ability, but few have asked whether it has the accuracy, authority and currency to be trustworthy enough for scholars. This article takes a look at reliability factors that go into Google Scholar citation counts, selection of resources, and its commercial partnerships. Research data culled from correspondence with Google Scholar, analysis of citation metrics, metadata and search processes, and an appraisal of its strengths and weaknesses compared to other science-specific indexes led to the conclusion that Google Scholar may be useful for initial and supplemental information gathering, but lacks a deeper reliability than other existing services currently provide scholars. Advice is offered to science librarians about how to regard Google Scholar as a research tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

About Google Scholar.. [Updated 2012 Apr 5]. Google Scholar. [Internet]. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html

Adriaanse, L.S. and Rensleigh, C. 2011. Comparing Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar from an environmental sciences perspective. South African Journal of Library & Information Science [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 77(2):169-178. Available from: http://www.sabinet.co.za/abstracts/liasa/liasa_v77_n2_a8.html

Bornmann, L., Marx, W., Schier, H., Rahm, E., Thor, A., and Daniel, H.D. 2009. Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry: citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts. Journal of Informetrics [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 3(1):27-35. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157708000667

Cecchino, N.J. 2010. Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 98(4):320-321. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947134/

Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. 1990. Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation, and information science. Amsterdam ; New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, p. 216-217.

García-Peréz, M.A. 2010. Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: a case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 61(10):2070-2085. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21372/full

Google Scholar Metrics. [Updated 2012 Apr 5]. Google Scholar. [Internet]. Available from http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html

Google Scholar Team. 2012 May 21. Google Scholar Sources. [Personal e-mail]. Accessed 2012 Jun 25.

Harzing, A.W. 2010. The publish or perish book : your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. First ed. Melbourne: Tarma Software Research Propriety Limited, 165-174.

Hauser, A. 2012 May 21. Google Scholar Sources. [Personal e-mail]. Accessed 2012 Jun 25.

Journal List. [Updated 2012 Jun 20]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnological Information. PubMed Help. [Internet]. Available from: {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/browse/}

Kirkwood, H.P. and Kirkwood M.C. 2011. Researching the life sciences: BIOSIS Previews and Google Scholar. Online [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 35(3):24-28. Available from: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/access/2341237991.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=May%2FJun+2011&author=Hal+P+Kirkwood+Jr%3BMonica+C+Kirkwood&pub=Online&edition=&startpage=24&desc=Researching+the+Life+Sciences%3A+BIOSIS+Previews+and+Google+Scholar

Lascar, C., Mendelsohn, L.D. 2011a. The evolution-intelligent design debate: a meaningful context for teaching the nature of science in information literacy. Part 1: historical background and philosophical considerations. Science & Technology Libraries [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 30(4):354-371. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0194262X.2011.626338

Lascar, C. and Mendelsohn, L.D. 2011b. The evolution-intelligent design debate: a meaningful context for teaching the nature of science in information literacy. Part 2: social boundaries and cognitive models. Science & Technology Libraries [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 30(4):372-386. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0194262X.2011.626339

Levine-Clark, M. and Kraus, J. 2007. Finding chemistry information using Google Scholar: a comparison with Chemical Abstracts Service. Science & Technology Libraries [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 27(4):3-17. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J122v27n04_02

Mayr, P. and Walter, A.K. 2008. Studying journal coverage in Google Scholar. Journal of Library Administration [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 47(1/2):81-99. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01930820802110894

Meier, J.J. and Conkling, T.W. 2008. Google Scholar's coverage of the engineering literature: an empirical study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 34(3): 196-201. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133308000335

Mikki, S. 2010. Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for earth sciences. Scientometrics [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 82(2):321-331. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/u86v2042qu654130/

Mullen, L.B. and Hartman, K.A. 2006. Google Scholar and the library web site: the early response by ARL libraries. College & Research Libraries [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 67(2):106-122. Available from: http://crl.acrl.org/content/67/2/106.full.pdf+html

Scholar Help. [Updated 2012 Apr 5]. Google Scholar. [Internet]. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/help.html

Shultz, M. 2007. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 95(4):442-445. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2000776/

Top Publications. [Updated 2012]. Google Scholar. [Internet]. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en

Walters, W.H. 2011. Comparative recall and precision of simple and expert searches in Google Scholar and eight other databases. portal: Libraries and the Academy [Internet]. [Cited 2012 Jun 20]; 11(4):971-1006. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/v011/11.4.walters.html

Downloads

Published

2012-08-01

How to Cite

Gray, J. E., Hamilton, M. C., Hauser, A., Janz, M. M., Peters, J. P., & Taggart, F. (2012). Scholar<i>ish</i>: Google Scholar and its Value to the Sciences. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (70). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1559

Issue

Section

Board Accepted Articles
Share |