E-STEM: Comparing Aggregator and Publisher E-Book Platforms.

Authors

  • Tara Tobin Cataldo
  • Michelle Leonard

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5062/F4FJ2DSP

Abstract

The University of Florida Libraries (UF), like many academic libraries, have been purchasing more e-books with each passing year. While most libraries that purchase e-books seemingly do so on very few platforms, the UF libraries currently have their collection of e-books available in over 35 different platforms. While this presents quite a challenge in terms of management it also presents an excellent opportunity for comparative analysis. Recent research focuses on the analysis of packages and the "big" deals, and highlights usage statistics but do not go into depth about the platforms and publishers. This article will compare Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) e-book platforms from both aggregators and publishers by examining features and usage statistics and making recommendations for consideration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Berg, S.A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. 2010. Not on the same page: Undergraduates' information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 36(6): 518-525. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.008.

COUNTER: Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources. 2014. Available from: http://www.projectcounter.org/

Bierman, J., Ortega, L., & Rupp-Serrano, K. 2010. E-book usage in pure and applied sciences. Science & Technology Libraries 29(1):69-91. doi:10.1080/01942620903579393.

D'Ambra, J., Wilson, C.S., & Akter, S. 2013. Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of e-books by academics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1): 48-64. doi:10.1002/asi.22757.

Foote, J.B., & Rupp-Serrano, K. 2010. Exploring e-book usage among faculty and graduate students in the geosciences: Results of a small survey and focus group approach. Science & Technology Libraries 29(3): 216-234. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2010.497716.

Muir, L., & Hawes, G. 2013. The case for e-book literacy: Undergraduate students' experience with e-books for course work. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 39(3): 260-274. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.002.

Nariani, R. 2009. E-books in the sciences: If we buy it will they use it? Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 59. doi:10.5062/F4WS8R5G.

Roncevic, M. 2014. E-Book Platforms for Libraries Chicago: American Library Association.

Shelton, T., Cataldo, T.T., Carrico, S., & Botero, C. 2014. How Users' Perceptions of E-Books Have Changed, or Not: Comparing Parallel Survey Responses. Presentation at the 2014 Charleston Conference. Available from: http://2014charlestonconference.sched.org/event/8cbc3068d680d8d80b99fbc188306c06#.VNkOHC6GNZg

Waters, J., Roach, J., Emde, J., McEathron, S. & Russell, K. 2014. A Comparison of E-book and Print Book Discovery, Preferences, and Usage by Science and Engineering Faculty and Graduate Students at the University of Kansas. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 75. doi:10.5062/F48G8HN5.

Zhang, Y. & Beckman, R. 2011. E-book usage among chemists, biochemists and biologists: Findings of a survey and interviews. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 65. doi: 10.5062/F49G5JR3

Downloads

Published

2015-06-01

How to Cite

Cataldo, T. T., & Leonard, M. (2015). E-STEM: Comparing Aggregator and Publisher E-Book Platforms. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (80). https://doi.org/10.5062/F4FJ2DSP

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |

Most read articles by the same author(s)