Are We Spending Too Much on Print STEM Monographs? A Method and Analysis for Improving Monograph Allocations Based on Circulation Statistics.

Authors

  • Jonathan Nabe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1580

Abstract

Circulation studies provide evidence of demand for monographs, but it is necessary to determine the goal of any analysis in order to select which statistics will be used. The goal of this analysis was to determine the appropriateness of expenditures on monographs within the STEM fields at Morris Library over a ten-year period. Percentage of unique title circulation and average circulation per title are best suited for this purpose. Results show variation among disciplines, but over-expenditure in all. Analysis of disciplines can aid in determining appropriate allocations for monographs, and analysis of subdisciplines can aid in targeting monograph acquisitions within any discipline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bosch, S. and Henderson, K. 2012. Coping with the terrible twins. Library Journal 137(8) 28-32.

Carrigan, D. 1996. Collection development - evaluation. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 22(4): 273-278. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90117-2

Knievel, J.E., Wicht, H. and Connaway, L. 2006. Use of circulation statistics and interlibrary loan data in collection management. College & Research Libraries 67(1): 35-49.

Stewart, C. 2011. METRICS: The next chapter: measuring the pace of change for print monograph collections. Journal of Academic Librarianship 37(4): 355-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2011.05.001

Tucker, J. 2009. Collection assessment of monograph purchases at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Libraries. Collection Management 34(3): 157-181. DOI:10.1080/01462670902962959

Tyler D., Melvin J., Yang X., Epp M., and Kreps A. 2011. Effective selectors? Interlibrary loan patrons as monograph purchasers: a comparative examination of price and circulation-related performance. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserves 21(1-2): 57-90. DOI:10.1080/1072303X.2011.557322

Downloads

Published

2013-08-01

How to Cite

Nabe, J. (2013). Are We Spending Too Much on Print STEM Monographs? A Method and Analysis for Improving Monograph Allocations Based on Circulation Statistics. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (73). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1580

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |