A Triangulation Method to Dismantling a Disciplinary "Big Deal".

Authors

  • Diane (DeDe) Dawson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5062/F4610X9H

Abstract

In late 2012, it appeared that the University Library, University of Saskatchewan would likely no longer be able to afford to subscribe to the entire American Chemical Society "Big Deal" of 36 journals. Difficult choices would need to be made regarding which titles to retain as individual subscriptions. In an effort to arrive at the most conscientious and evidence-based decisions possible, three discrete sources of data were collected and compared: full-text downloads, citation analysis of faculty publications, and user feedback. This case study will describe the triangulation method developed -- including the unconventional approach of applying a citation analysis technique to usage data and survey responses. Such a thorough, labor-intensive, method is likely not practical for analyzing larger, multidisciplinary journal bundles. When it becomes necessary to break up a smaller collection important to researchers in a particular discipline, this technique may provide strong evidence to support librarian decisions as well as involve faculty in the process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrés, A. 2009. Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford (U.K.): Chandos Publishing. p. 31-33.

Blecic, D.D., Wiberley, S.E., Fiscella, J.B., Bahnmaier-Blaszczak, S., & Lowery, R. 2013. Deal or no deal? Evaluating big deals and their journals. College & Research Libraries 74(2):178-194. doi: 10.5860/crl-300

Bosch, S. & Henderson, K. 2014 April 11. Steps down the evolutionary road: Periodicals price survey 2014. Library Journal [Internet]. [Cited 2015 Mar 11]. Available from: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2014/04/publishing/steps-down-the-evolutionary-road-periodicals-price-survey-2014/

Cleary, C. 2009. Why the "Big Deal" continues to persist. The Serials Librarian 57(4):364-379. doi: 10.1080/03615260903206853

Crawford, W. 2012. Walking away: Courage and acquisitions. Cites & Insights [Internet]. [Cited 2015 Jan 19]; 12(12):25-38. Available from: http://citesandinsights.info/civ12i12.pdf

deVries, S., Kelly, R. & Storm, P.M. 2010. Moving beyond citation analysis: How surveys and interviews enhance, enrich, and expand your research findings. College & Research Libraries 71(5):456-466. doi: 10.5860/crl-45r1

Frazier, K. 2001. The librarians' dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the "Big Deal." D-Lib Magazine [Internet]. [Cited 2014 Dec 9]; 7(3). Available from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html

Frazier, K. 2005. What's the big deal? The Serials Librarian 48(1-2):49-59. doi: 10.1300/J123v48n01_06

Hoffmann, K. & Doucette, L. 2012. A review of citation analysis methodologies for collection management. College & Research Libraries 73(4):321-335. doi: 10.5860/crl-254

Nabe, J. & Fowler, D.C. 2012. Leaving the "Big Deal": Consequences and next steps. The Serials Librarian 62(1-4):59-72. doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2012.652524

Nisonger, T.E. 1998. Management of serials in libraries. Englewood (CO): Libraries Unlimited. p. 136-140.

Nisonger, T.E. 2008. The "80/20 Rule" and core journals. The Serials Librarian 55(1-2):62-84. doi: 10.1080/03615260801970774

Rogers, J. 2012 Sept 12. Walking away from the American Chemical Society. Attempting Elegance [Internet]. [Cited 2015 Jan 19]. Available from: http://www.attemptingelegance.com/?p=1765

Downloads

Published

2015-06-01

How to Cite

Dawson, D. (DeDe). (2015). A Triangulation Method to Dismantling a Disciplinary "Big Deal". Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (80). https://doi.org/10.5062/F4610X9H

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |