How Different Are They? A Comparison By Academic Area Of Library Use, Priorities, and Information Needs at the University of Washington.
Theme: Assessment in Sci-Tech Libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1877Abstract
The University of Washington Libraries has conducted large-scale library surveys on a triennial cycle since 1992. These surveys are sent to all faculty members and a random sample of graduate and undergraduate students. Surveys measure user satisfaction with library services and resources and have also included questions on the reasons faculty and students use (or don't use) libraries, use and application of electronic information, importance of information resources, and their priorities for library services and resources. Survey results comprise a rich lode of information about library use and needs during a period of rapid change in the information environment.
The University of Washington Libraries is unique not only in the regularity of its systematic surveying of the user community but also in the large number of surveys that are returned, especially by faculty (1,100 to 1,500 for each survey). The size and representative nature of the respondent pool has enabled us to generalize for the population as a whole and do statistical analysis by academic subject area. One of the more striking findings of this analysis has been the substantial differences shown in library/information needs and use by those in different subject fields. This paper will focus on the differences (and also some similarities) between scientists/engineers and other academic areas in their library use and information needs at a large American research university.
Downloads
References
Association of Research Libraries, Office of Management Services. 1994. User surveys in ARL libraries. A SPEC Kit compiled by Elaine Brekke. Systems and Procedures Exchange Center (SPEC) Kit 205. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
Association of Research Libraries, Office of Management Services. 1988. User surveys. Systems and Procedures Exchange Center (SPEC) Kit 148. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
Association of Research Libraries, Office of Management Services. 1984. User studies in ARL libraries. Systems and Procedures Exchange Center (SPEC) Kit 101. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
Association of Research Libraries, Office of Management Services. 1981. User surveys and evaluation of library services. Systems and Procedures Exchange Center (SPEC) Kit 71. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
Berger, K. and Hines R. 1994. What does the user really want? The library survey project at Duke University. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20 (5/6):306-309.
Cook, C., Heath, F., Thompson, B., & Thompson, R.L. 2001. The search for new measures: The ARL "LibQUAL+TM" study--a preliminary report. Portals: Libraries and the Academy, 1, 103-112.
Cook, C., Heath F., and Thompson B. 2000. LibQUAL+: One instrument in the new measures toolbox. ARL Newsletter: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 212, 4-7.
Hernon, P. and Altman, E. 1998. Assessing service quality: Satisfying the expectations of customers. Chicago: American Library Association.
Hernon, P. and Altman E. 1996. Service quality in academic libraries. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Hernon, P. and Whitman, J. 2001. Delivering satisfaction and service quality: A customer-based approach for libraries. Chicago: American Library Association.
Hiller, S. 2001. Assessing user needs, satisfaction and library performance at the University of Washington. Library Trends, 49 (4), Spring 2001, 605-625.
Hiller, S. and Self, J. 2001. A Decade of User Surveys: Utilizing a Standard Assessment Tool to Measure Library Performance. Paper presented at the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measures in Libraries and Information Services, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, August 2001. Conference Proceedings to be published in 2002 by the Association of Research Libraries.
Nitecki, D. and Franklin B. 1999. Perspectives on new measures for research libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25 (6), 484-487.
Talbot, D., Lowell G., and Martin, K. 1998. From the user's perspective - the UCSD libraries user survey project. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24 (5), 357-364.
Van House, N., Weil N., and McClure, C. 1990. Measuring academic library performance: A practical approach. Chicago: American Library Association.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.
