Suiting Library Instruction to the Myers-Briggs Personality Types and Holland Vocational Personality Types of Engineering Students

Authors

  • Jeanine Williamson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1928

Abstract

The Myers-Briggs personality typology and the Holland Vocational typology of work environments and individuals offer insights about engineering students and faculty that librarians may apply to instruction. This article provides a literature review of the two theories as applicable to library instruction; discusses the personality make-ups of engineering students, Engineering faculty, and librarians; discusses selected literature relating the two theories to learning; and provides possible applications of the Myers-Briggs system and the Holland Vocational system to information literacy or library instruction for engineering students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernold et al. 2000. Impact of holistic and learning-oriented teaching on academic success. Journal of Engineering Education 89: 191-199.

Bruch, M.A. & Krieshok, T.S. 1981. Investigative versus Realistic Holland types and adjustment in theoretical engineering majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior 18:162-173.

Christy, A.D. & Lima, M. 1998. Use of student portfolios in engineering instruction. Journal of Engineering Education 87(2): 143-148.

Cooper, S.E. & Miller, J.A. 1991. MBTI learning style-teaching style discongruencies. Educational and Psychological Measurement 51: 699-706.

David, I. & Scherdin, M. 1994. Librarians in transition: profiles on the Strong Interest Inventory. In Discovering Librarians: Profiles of a Profession (ed. by M. Scherdin) , pp.102-124. Chicago: ACRL.

Erez, M. & Shneorson, Z. 1980. Personality types and motivational characteristics of academics versus professionals in industry in the same occupational discipline. Journal of Vocational Behavior 17: 95-105.

Fairhurst, A.M. & Fairhurst, L.L. 1995. Effective Teaching Effective Learning: Making the Personality Connection in Your Classroom. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

Felder, R.M. et al. 1993. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention I. Success and failure in the introductory course. Journal of Engineering Education : 15-21.

Fouad, N.A. 1989. Cross-cultural similarity of vocational interests of professional engineers. Journal of Vocational Behavior 34: 88-99.

Godleski, E.S. 1984. Learning style compatibility of engineering students and faculty. In Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 362-364. New York: IEEE.

Gottfredson, G.D. & Holland, J.L. 1996. Dictionary of Holland Occupational Codes. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Holland, J.L. 1997. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Holland, J.L., et al. 1994. The Self-Directed Search (SDS) Technical Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Holland, J.L. 1985. Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Jung, C.G. 1923. Psychological Types: or, The Psychology of Individuation. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Keirsey, D. & Bates, M.M. 1984. Please Understand Me: Character and Temperament Types. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis.

Kresta, S.M. 1998. Hands-on demonstrations: and alternative to full scale lab experiments. Journal of Engineering Education 87: 7-9.

Lawrence, G. 1997. Looking at Type and Learning Styles. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc.

Lawrence. G. 1984. A synthesis of learning style research involving the MBTI. Journal of Psychological Type 8: 2-15.

Lent, R.W. et al. 1989. Relation of self-efficacy to inventoried vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior 34: 279-288.

Matta, K.F. & Kern, G.M. 1991. Interactive videodisc instruction: the influence of personality on learning. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 541-552.

McCaulley, M.H. et al. 1987. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and retention in engineering. International Journal of Applied Engineering Education 3(2): 99-109.

McCaulley, M.H. et al. 1983. Applications of psychological type in engineering education. Engineering Education : 394-400.

Morstain, B.R. & Smart, J.C. 1976. Educational orientations of faculty: Assessing a personality model of the academic professions. Psychological Reports 39(3, Pt. 2): 1199-1211.

Myers, I.B. 1998. Introduction to Type. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

Myers, I.B. et al. 1998. MBTI Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

Rosati, P. 1997. Psychological types of Canadian engineering students. Journal of Psychological Type 41: 33-37.

Scherdin, M.J. 1994a. Librarians and information professionals: how do we resemble each other? In Discovering Librarians: Profiles of a Profession (ed. by M. Scherdin), pp. 12-31. Chicago: ACRL.

Scherdin, M.J. 1994b. Vive la difference: exploring librarian personality types using the MBTI. In Discovering Librarians: Profiles of a Profession (ed. by M. Scherdin), pp. 125-156. Chicago: ACRL.

Scott, T.H. & Scott, J.C. 1996. Utilization of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator by a freshman engineering advising center. In Lifelong Learning in Engineering Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education 1996 Southeastern Section Meeting : April 14-16, 1996, Knoxville, Tennessee. Washington, D.C.: ASEE.

Sloan, E.D. 1998. Personality and teaching/learning engineering. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: ASEE.

Sloan, E.D. & Jens, K.S. 1982. Differences and implications in faculty and student types on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: ASEE.

Southworth, J.A. & Morningstar, M.E. 1970. Persistence of occupational choice and personality congruence. Journal of Counseling Psychology 17(5), 409-412.

Staiger, E.H. 1990. Electrical engineering freshman type tables. Journal of Psychological Type 20: 40-45.

Thomas, A. et al. 2000. The evidence remains stable: the MBTI predicts attraction and attrition in an engineering program. Journal of Psychological Type 55: 35-42.

Thomas, C.R. 1990. Exploratory studies of psychological type and engineering students: three brief reports. Journal of Psychological Type 18: 57-62.

Tieger, P.D. & Barron-Tieger, B. 2001. Do What You Are: Discover the Perfect Career for You Through the Secret of Personality Type. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.

Walsh, W.B. & Holland, J.L. 1992. A theory of personality types and work environments. In Person-Environment Psychology: Models and Perspectives (ed. by W.B. Walsh et al.), pp. 35-69. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wankat, P.C. 1999. Reflective analysis of student learning in a sophomore engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education :195-203.

Yokomoto, C.F. & Ware, J.R. 1981. Implications of Jungian perception on problem solving. In Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 304-309. New York: IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2003-05-29

How to Cite

Williamson, J. (2003). Suiting Library Instruction to the Myers-Briggs Personality Types and Holland Vocational Personality Types of Engineering Students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (37). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1928
Share |