Suiting Library Instruction to the Myers-Briggs Personality Types and Holland Vocational Personality Types of Engineering Students

Authors

  • Jeanine Williamson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1928

Abstract

The Myers-Briggs personality typology and the Holland Vocational typology of work environments and individuals offer insights about engineering students and faculty that librarians may apply to instruction. This article provides a literature review of the two theories as applicable to library instruction; discusses the personality make-ups of engineering students, Engineering faculty, and librarians; discusses selected literature relating the two theories to learning; and provides possible applications of the Myers-Briggs system and the Holland Vocational system to information literacy or library instruction for engineering students.

Downloads

References

Bernold et al. 2000. Impact of holistic and learning-oriented teaching on academic success. Journal of Engineering Education 89: 191-199.

Bruch, M.A. & Krieshok, T.S. 1981. Investigative versus Realistic Holland types and adjustment in theoretical engineering majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior 18:162-173.

Christy, A.D. & Lima, M. 1998. Use of student portfolios in engineering instruction. Journal of Engineering Education 87(2): 143-148.

Cooper, S.E. & Miller, J.A. 1991. MBTI learning style-teaching style discongruencies. Educational and Psychological Measurement 51: 699-706.

David, I. & Scherdin, M. 1994. Librarians in transition: profiles on the Strong Interest Inventory. In Discovering Librarians: Profiles of a Profession (ed. by M. Scherdin) , pp.102-124. Chicago: ACRL.

Erez, M. & Shneorson, Z. 1980. Personality types and motivational characteristics of academics versus professionals in industry in the same occupational discipline. Journal of Vocational Behavior 17: 95-105.

Fairhurst, A.M. & Fairhurst, L.L. 1995. Effective Teaching Effective Learning: Making the Personality Connection in Your Classroom. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

Felder, R.M. et al. 1993. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention I. Success and failure in the introductory course. Journal of Engineering Education : 15-21.

Fouad, N.A. 1989. Cross-cultural similarity of vocational interests of professional engineers. Journal of Vocational Behavior 34: 88-99.

Godleski, E.S. 1984. Learning style compatibility of engineering students and faculty. In Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 362-364. New York: IEEE.

Gottfredson, G.D. & Holland, J.L. 1996. Dictionary of Holland Occupational Codes. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Holland, J.L. 1997. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Holland, J.L., et al. 1994. The Self-Directed Search (SDS) Technical Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Holland, J.L. 1985. Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Jung, C.G. 1923. Psychological Types: or, The Psychology of Individuation. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Keirsey, D. & Bates, M.M. 1984. Please Understand Me: Character and Temperament Types. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis.

Kresta, S.M. 1998. Hands-on demonstrations: and alternative to full scale lab experiments. Journal of Engineering Education 87: 7-9.

Lawrence, G. 1997. Looking at Type and Learning Styles. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc.

Lawrence. G. 1984. A synthesis of learning style research involving the MBTI. Journal of Psychological Type 8: 2-15.

Lent, R.W. et al. 1989. Relation of self-efficacy to inventoried vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior 34: 279-288.

Matta, K.F. & Kern, G.M. 1991. Interactive videodisc instruction: the influence of personality on learning. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 541-552.

McCaulley, M.H. et al. 1987. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and retention in engineering. International Journal of Applied Engineering Education 3(2): 99-109.

McCaulley, M.H. et al. 1983. Applications of psychological type in engineering education. Engineering Education : 394-400.

Morstain, B.R. & Smart, J.C. 1976. Educational orientations of faculty: Assessing a personality model of the academic professions. Psychological Reports 39(3, Pt. 2): 1199-1211.

Myers, I.B. 1998. Introduction to Type. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

Myers, I.B. et al. 1998. MBTI Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

Rosati, P. 1997. Psychological types of Canadian engineering students. Journal of Psychological Type 41: 33-37.

Scherdin, M.J. 1994a. Librarians and information professionals: how do we resemble each other? In Discovering Librarians: Profiles of a Profession (ed. by M. Scherdin), pp. 12-31. Chicago: ACRL.

Scherdin, M.J. 1994b. Vive la difference: exploring librarian personality types using the MBTI. In Discovering Librarians: Profiles of a Profession (ed. by M. Scherdin), pp. 125-156. Chicago: ACRL.

Scott, T.H. & Scott, J.C. 1996. Utilization of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator by a freshman engineering advising center. In Lifelong Learning in Engineering Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education 1996 Southeastern Section Meeting : April 14-16, 1996, Knoxville, Tennessee. Washington, D.C.: ASEE.

Sloan, E.D. 1998. Personality and teaching/learning engineering. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: ASEE.

Sloan, E.D. & Jens, K.S. 1982. Differences and implications in faculty and student types on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: ASEE.

Southworth, J.A. & Morningstar, M.E. 1970. Persistence of occupational choice and personality congruence. Journal of Counseling Psychology 17(5), 409-412.

Staiger, E.H. 1990. Electrical engineering freshman type tables. Journal of Psychological Type 20: 40-45.

Thomas, A. et al. 2000. The evidence remains stable: the MBTI predicts attraction and attrition in an engineering program. Journal of Psychological Type 55: 35-42.

Thomas, C.R. 1990. Exploratory studies of psychological type and engineering students: three brief reports. Journal of Psychological Type 18: 57-62.

Tieger, P.D. & Barron-Tieger, B. 2001. Do What You Are: Discover the Perfect Career for You Through the Secret of Personality Type. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.

Walsh, W.B. & Holland, J.L. 1992. A theory of personality types and work environments. In Person-Environment Psychology: Models and Perspectives (ed. by W.B. Walsh et al.), pp. 35-69. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wankat, P.C. 1999. Reflective analysis of student learning in a sophomore engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education :195-203.

Yokomoto, C.F. & Ware, J.R. 1981. Implications of Jungian perception on problem solving. In Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 304-309. New York: IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2003-05-29

How to Cite

Williamson, J. (2003). Suiting Library Instruction to the Myers-Briggs Personality Types and Holland Vocational Personality Types of Engineering Students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (37). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1928
Share |