Inclusive Science Communication Approaches Through an Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice (EDISJ) Lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2810Keywords:
Inclusive science communication, STEM equity, Public engagement, Scientific discourse, Science librariesAbstract
Science communication has taken center stage in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) disciplines in the context of public outreach and citizen science. Developing practical communication skills is imperative for all scientists to be highly successful in their careers and more so for underrepresented and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) professionals in STEM. The program, led by the Engineering and Science Librarian at the University of Victoria (UVic) Libraries, aimed to equip students and early career scientists with critical communication skills by leveraging the unique voices and lived experiences of BIPOC speakers in STEM disciplines. Through this program, a unique toolkit with engaging modules consisting of 30 short videos, each three minutes long (30 x 3) by BIPOC speakers was created to provide broad foundational skills in verbal and visual communication, using an Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice (EDISJ) lens. A two-day conference offered networking and communication development opportunities to students and early-career scientists in STEM disciplines by connecting them with BIPOC STEM leaders and visionaries who promote STEM advocacy. This paper will discuss the methods used in the creation of the toolkit and conference using an EDISJ lens.
Downloads
References
Aesoph, L. M. (2016). Definition of adapt. https://opentextbc.ca/adaptopentextbook/chapter/definition-of-adapt/
Allen, M. (2017). Chapter 4. Designing online asynchronous information literacy instruction using the ADDIE model. In T. Maddison & M. Kumaran (Eds.), Distributed Learning (pp. 69–91). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100598-9.00004-0
Archer, L., Dawson, E., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2016). Disorientating, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families’ experiences of a science museum visit. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9667-7
Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A. (2012). Two-eyed seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8
Benes, K. M. (2017). Overcoming barriers to engaging in science communication: An interview with science communicator Paige Brown Jarreau. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, 26(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/lob.10159
Bird, N. (2021). The emotional labour of Indigenous post-secondary students: A trauma-informed autoethnography [Thesis, Dalhousie University]. https://DalSpace.library.dal.ca//handle/10222/80815
Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6–E10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852879/
Canfield, K., & Menezes, S. (2020). The state of inclusive science communication: A landscape study. University of Rhode Island. https://www.informalscience.org/state-inclusive-science-communication-landscape-study
Canfield, K., Menezes, S., Matsuda, S. B., Moore, A., Mosley Austin, A. N., Dewsbury, B. M., Feliú-Mójer, M. I., McDuffie, K. W. B., Moore, K., Reich, C. A., Smith, H. M., & Taylor, C. (2020). Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality. Frontiers in Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00002
Carter, T. L., Jennings, L. L., Pressler, Y., Gallo, A. C., Berhe, A. A., Marín-Spiotta, E., Shepard, C., Ghezzehei, T., & Vaughan, K. L. (2021). Towards diverse representation and inclusion in soil science in the United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 85(4), 963–974. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20210
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Dawson, E. (2014). Reframing social exclusion from science communication: Moving away from ‘barriers’ towards a more complex perspective. Journal of Science Communication, 13(2), C02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13020302
Etzion, D., Gehman, J., & Davis, G. F. (2022). Reimagining academic conferences: Toward a federated model of conferencing. Management Learning, 53(2), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211019529
Evangelista, D. A., Goodman, A., Kohli, M. K., Bondocgawa Maflamills, S. S. T., Samuel-Foo, M., Herrera, M. S., Ware, J. L., & Wilson, M. (2020). Why diversity matters among those who study diversity. American Entomologist, 66(3), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/tmaa037
Flaherty, C. (2019, June 4). Undue burden. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/06/04/whos-doing-heavy-lifting-terms-diversity-and-inclusion-work
Gunter, C., Sinha, C. B., & Jaquess, D. (2021). Participation in a science festival promotes inclusive science communication around autism spectrum disorder (p. 2021.01.04.425324). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.04.425324
IEEE (2020, October 15). Why women in tech favor companies with strong diversity goals. IEEE Innovation at Work. https://innovationatwork.ieee.org/why-women-in-tech-favor-companies-with-strong-diversity-goals/
Hays, L., & Handler, K. (2020). Good design is universal: Using universal design principles to promote self-regulated learning in learning management systems when teaching information literacy. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 14(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2020.1828219
Hwang, K. (2013). Effects of the language barrier on processes and performance of international scientific collaboration, collaborators’ participation, organizational integrity, and interorganizational relationships. Science Communication, 35(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012437442
Kearns, F. (2021). Getting to the heart of science communication: A guide to effective engagement. Island Press.
Khailova, L., & Bernstein, M. (2021). Scaling up library information literacy instruction by developing learning management systems ready asynchronous modules. Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2021/2021/33
Khelifa, R., & Mahdjoub, H. (2022). An intersectionality lens is needed to establish a global view of equity, diversity and inclusion. Ecology Letters, 25(5), 1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13976
King, N. S., & Pringle, R. M. (2019). Black girls speak STEM: Counterstories of informal and formal learning experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21513
King-Kostelac, A., Gomez, E. A., Finucane, M. M., Gorton, S., Killian, J. L., Walker, K., Bush, J. K., & Smith, J. A. (2022). Sci/comm scholars: A facilitated peer-to-peer working group for integrating rhetorical and social scientific approaches for inclusive science communication. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.787557
Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), Article 7479. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a
Liu, S.-N. C., Brown, S. E., & Sabat, I. E. (2019). Patching the “leaky pipeline”: Interventions for women of color faculty in STEM academia. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 7(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000062
Mathuews, K. (2016). Moving beyond diversity to social justice. Progressive Librarian, 44. http://www.progressivelibrariansguild.org/PL/PL44.pdf#page=8
National Academies of Sciences, E., Education, D. of B. and S. S. and, & Agenda, C. on the S. of S. C. A. R. (2017). Using science to improve science communication. In Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425715/
Risquez, A., Cassidy, D., & O’Suilleabhain, G. (2020). Badge of honour? An exploration of the use of digital badges to support a partnership approach to faculty development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6112
Singh, M., & Major, J. (2017). Conducting Indigenous research in western knowledge spaces: Aligning theory and methodology. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0233-z
Stamm, K. (2009). Stereotype threat and implicit attitudes: Implications for the leaky pipeline of women in science [Open Access Dissertations, University of Rhode Island]. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/918
Tchangalova, N. (2019). Nuts and bolts: Inclusive library instructional practices using UDL guidelines. https://nadp-uk.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/UDL-Library-2.pdf
Tomaszewski, R. (2021). A STEM e-class in action: A case study for asynchronous one-shot library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102414
University of Victoria—Undergraduate. (2023). University of Victoria (UVic). https://www.uvic.ca/undergraduate/index.php
Whitver, S. M. (2020). Accessible library instruction in practice. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 20(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0019
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aditi Gupta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
