Using Digital Learning Objects for Instructional Support for Faculty in Agricultural Sciences: A Pilot Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2836Keywords:
Agricultural librarianship, Digital learning objects, Information literacy, Land-grant institutions, Liaison librarian, Library collaborationAbstract
This pilot study explores how agricultural sciences faculty utilize Digital Learning Objects (DLOs) in their courses and collaborate with librarians to improve students’ information literacy skills. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 14 agricultural sciences faculty members at two land-grant institutions in the United States. The identified key themes from the interviews include the current use of DLOs, challenges in their implementation, and the impact on student learning outcomes. Findings reveal that faculty recognize the value of DLOs for fostering independent learning and improving information literacy skills. However, there are challenges related to technical issues and the need for ongoing librarian support. The study highlights not only the importance of collaboration between faculty and librarians in developing effective DLOs, but also DLOs’ potential to meet the evolving instruction needs in agricultural education. These insights can guide future efforts to enhance the role of DLOs in academic settings, ultimately contributing to a more information-literate and capable agricultural workforce. The findings of the study will also benefit librarians who liaise with agricultural sciences faculty or are responsible for DLO creation.
Downloads
References
The ALA/ACRL/STS Task Force on Information Literacy for Science and Technology. (2006). Information literacy standards for science and engineering/technology. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/infolitscitech
Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., Podgornik, B. B., Rodič, B., & Zoranović, T. (2018). A comparative study of information literacy skill performance of students in agricultural sciences. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.004
Bracke, M. S. (2017). Agricultural librarians becoming informationists: A paradigm shift. Library Trends, 65(3), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2017.0011
Caminita, C. M. (2015). Embedding the agriculture librarian in an agriculture residential college: A case study. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 16(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2014.984039
Contrino, J. L. (2016). Instructional learning objects in the digital classroom: Effectively measuring impact on student success. Journal of Library & Information Services In Distance Learning, 10(3–4), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2016.1206786
Davis, V. (2007). Challenges of connecting off-campus agricultural science users with library services. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 8(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J108v08n02_05
DeBose, K. G., Haugen, I., & Miller, R. K. (2017). Information literacy instruction programs: Supporting the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences community at Virginia Tech. Library Trends, 65(3), 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2017.0004
Dugan, M. (2008). Embedded librarians in an ag econ class: Transcending the traditional. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 9(4), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496500802480342
Gilman, N. V., Sagàs, J., Camper, M., & Norton, A. P. (2017). A faculty–librarian collaboration success story: Implementing a teach-the-teacher library and information literacy instruction model in a first-year agricultural science course. Library Trends, 65(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2017.0005
Grainger, B. (1987). Library instruction for agricultural students in Canadian universities. Quarterly Bulletin of the International Association of Agricultural Librarians & Documentalists, 32(1), 25–29.
Hardy, A., & McKenzie, C. (2020). Meeting students where they are: Just in time embedded delivery of information and digital literacy skills. International Information & Library Review, 52(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2019.1710672
Janson, A., & Janson, R. (2009). Integrating digital learning objects in the classroom: A need for educational leadership. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol5/iss3/4
Kuruppu, P. U., & Gruber, A. M. (2006). Understanding the information needs of academic scholars in agricultural and biological sciences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(6), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.08.001
Linsinbigler, V., Lowder, C., Mattson, J., Murphy-Lang, A., & LoPresto, S. (2021). User-centered design of a library tutorials page: A solution to digital hoarding. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 15(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2021.1938787
Love, S., & Blankstein, M. (2024). US instructor survey 2024: Findings from a national survey. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.321165
Mestre, L. S., Baures, L., Niedbala, M., Bishop, C., Cantrell, S., Perez, A., & Silfen, K. (2011). Learning objects as tools for teaching information literacy online: A survey of librarian usage. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-130rl
National Research Council. (1995). Colleges of agriculture at the land grant universities: A profile. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4980
O’Clair, K., & Gillard, S. M. (2018). Student perceptions of an online model for library orientation in agriculture and related disciplines. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 19(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2017.1404469
Pelletier, K., Robert, J., Muscanell, N., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., & Grajek, S. (2023). 2023 EDUCAUSE horizon report, teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2023/4/2023hrteachinglearning.pdf
Pouchard, L., & Bracke, M. S. (2016). An analysis of selected data practices: A case study of the Purdue College of Agriculture. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 85. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1691
Sherriff, G., Benson, D., & Atwood, G. S. (2019). Practices, policies, and problems in the management of learning data: A survey of libraries’ use of digital learning objects and the data they create. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.12.005
Simonsen, J. E. (2015). The liaison’s role in serving agriculture & life sciences information users: A review of the literature. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 16(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2014.982753
Singh, D., & Joshi, M. K. (2013). Information literacy competency of post graduate students at Haryana Agricultural University and impact of instruction initiatives: A pilot survey. Reference Services Review, 41(3), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2012-0074
Solis, E., & Perkins, D. (2017). Globetrotting students and faculty: Adapting library instruction to global sites. Journal of Library & Information Services In Distance Learning, 11(1–2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2016.1229419
Wiley, D. A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In Wiley, D. A., (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects (1st ed., pp. 3–23). Agency for Instructional Technology; Association for Educational Communications & Technology.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hanwen Dong, Maggie Albro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.
