Adding Libraries to the Equation: Mathematical Sciences’ Underutilization of Academic Librarians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2857Keywords:
Mathematics faculty, Academic librarians, Math librarians, Information literacy instruction, Faculty-librarian relationshipsAbstract
Academic librarians do not engage with all disciplinary departments equally. Despite equal or even greater efforts, some departments are less responsive to librarian outreach. One such department is mathematics. To understand mathematics departments’ relationships with their academic librarians, three mathematics librarians created a 20-question survey that was disseminated to mathematics faculty, instructors, and instructional staff in the United States and Canada. Of the 188 survey participants, more than a third reported that they never engage with their librarians, approximately half only do so occasionally, and a mere eight percent of participants collaborated with librarians to provide information literacy instruction (IL) to their students. Participant responses revealed that mathematics faculty and instructors find librarian support unnecessary, often do not understand what librarians do or what services they offer and have limited time to include IL in course curricula. Participants also provided information about the resources they use for instruction, the university services and centers they use for their research, and the resources they would like to have in their library.
Downloads
References
Albro, M. H., Sheffield, K. M., Grant, A., & Redd, R. T. (2018). Information literacy and mathematics education students: A case study in library instruction essays and opinion pieces. Journal of New Librarianship, 3(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.21173/newlibs/4/12
Appleton, L. (2018). Positioning the academic library within the institution: Structures and challenges. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(3–4), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2019.1582078
Barringer, S. (1989). Introducing undergraduates to mathematics information resources. Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 1(4), 27–28. https://doi.org/10.5642/hmnj.198901.04.12
Becksford, L. (2022). Instruction librarians’ perceptions of the faculty–librarian relationship. Communications in Information Literacy, 16(2), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.2.3
Betne, P., & Castonguay, R. (2008). On the role of mathematics educators and librarians in constructivist pedagogy. Education, 129(1), 56–79. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ816970
Bishop, B. W., Gavel, S., Chapin, E., Fernandez, P., & Allard, S. (2023). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) liaison librarians: Perspectives on functions and frequencies for serving academic researchers. Library & Information Science Research, 45(4), 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101265
Buljung, B., Vuletich, S., & Dunn, L. (2023). Aligning information literacy terminology to STEM disciplinary language used in the scientific method. Education for Information, 39(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-230036
Bussmann, J. D., Altamirano, I. M., Hansen, S., Johnson, N. E., & Keer, G. (2021). Science librarianship and social justice: Part three: Advanced concepts. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 97. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2601
Bussmann, J. D., & Bond, J. D. (2015). Information literacy in mathematics undergraduate education: Where does it stand today? Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 81. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1655
Church-Duran, J. (2017). Distinctive roles: Engagement, innovation, and the liaison model. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(2), 257–271. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0015
Coffey, L. (2024, May 1). New AI guidelines aim to help research libraries. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/libraries/2024/05/01/new-ai-guidelines-aim-help-research-librarians
Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process of science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005
Cuevas-Cerveró, A., Colmenero-Ruiz, M.-J., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2023). Critical information literacy as a form of information activism. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102786
De Paor, S., & Heravi, B. (2020). Information literacy and fake news: How the field of librarianship can help combat the epidemic of fake news. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102218
Engel, D., Robbins, S., & Kulp, C. (2011). The information-seeking habits of engineering faculty. College & Research Libraries, 72(6), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-155
Erickson, A. (2017). Introducing mathematics to information problem-solving tasks: Surface or substance? In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1147–1154). Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581375.pdf
Erickson, A. (2019). Introducing information literacy to mathematics classrooms: A cross-case analysis. Numeracy, 12(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.12.1.7
Fagan, J. C., Ostermiller, H., Price, E., & Sapp, L. (2021). Academic librarian perceptions of academic librarians: Building a foundation of shared understanding. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 27(2), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1765817
Gordon, I. D., Cameron, B. D., Chaves, D., & Hutchinson, R. (2020). Information seeking behaviors, attitudes, and choices of academic mathematicians. Science & Technology Libraries, 39(3), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2020.1758284
Gross, L. K., Chang, S. H., & Dinneen, M. (2016). Strengthening information literacy in a writing-designated course in the mathematics major. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 23(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2014.933689
Hamilton, A. D. (2021). The establishment and evolution of liaison librarian program. In R. Canuel & C. Crichton (Eds.), Approaches to liaison librarianship: Innovations in organization and engagement (pp. 7–22). Association of College & Research Libraries.
Holden, I. I. (2019). ACRL framework in information literacy in mathematics and statistics class: What students of mathematics think about it? Science & Technology Libraries, 38(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2018.1555075
Hoodless, C., & Pinfield, S. (2018). Subject vs. functional: Should subject librarians be replaced by functional specialists in academic libraries? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616653647
James, A., & Filgo, E. (2023). Where does ChatGPT fit into the Framework for Information Literacy? The possibilities and problems of AI in library instruction. College & Research Libraries News, 84(9), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.9.334
Johnson, K., Dieppa, A., & Elek, J. (2024). Composing math: An interdisciplinary faculty partnership to improve undergraduate writing in a research-focused capstone course. PRIMUS, 34(4), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2024.2312924
Julien, H., Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2018). Survey of information literacy instructional practices in U.S. academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 79(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.2.179
Kranich, N., Lotts, M., Nielsen, J., & Ward, J. H. (2020). Moving from collecting to connecting: Articulating, assessing, and communicating the work of liaison librarians. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 20(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0015
Krantz, S. G. (2017). Essentials of mathematical thinking (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315116822
LaRue, J. (2010, November 16). The visibility and invisibility of librarians. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/the-visibility-and-invisibility-of-librarians
Loesch, M. F. (211). From both sides, now: Librarians team up with computer scientist to deliver virtual computer-information literacy instruction. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 5(4), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2011.641712
Mercer, K., Weaver, K. D., Figueiredo, R., & Carter, C. (2020). Critical appraisal: The key to unlocking information literacy in the STEM disciplines. College & Research Libraries News, 81(3), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.81.3.145
Mohr, S. M., Ziegler, A., Lehan, T. J., & Wengel, J. (2022). The road less traveled: Assessing the impact of virtual research consultations on online doctoral student persistence. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 26(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2022.2072043
Monroe-Gulick, A., Valentine, G., & Brooks-Kieffer, J. (2017). “You need to have a street beat”: A qualitative study of faculty research needs and challenges. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(4), 777–802. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0046
Mullins, K., & Boyd-Byrnes, M. K. (2024). Academic librarians’ contribution to information literacy instruction and learning. College & Research Libraries, 85(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.3.423
Newby, J. (2005). An emerging picture of mathematicians’ use of electronic resources: The effect of withdrawal of older print volumes. Science & Technology Libraries, 25(4), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J122v25n04_06
Niu, X., Hemminger, B. M., Lown, C., Adams, S., Brown, C., Level, A., McLure, M., Powers, A., Tennant, M. R., & Cataldo, T. (2010). National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(5), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21307
Palumbo, L., Bussmann, J. D., & Kern, B. (2021). The value of subject specialization and the future of science liaison librarianship. College & Research Libraries, 82(4), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.4.584
Reed, R. B., & Butkovich, N. J. (2017). Comparison of data and informatics responsibilities and job titles between academic STEM and medical librarians. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 87. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1708
Rutter, S. (2002). Mathematicians and the mathematics library: A librarian’s perspective. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 49(9), 1078–1081. https://www.ams.org/notices/200209/comm-rutter.pdf
Sapa, R., Krakowska, M., & Janiak, M. (2014). Information seeking behaviour of mathematicians: Scientists and students. Information Research, 19(4). https://www.informationr.net/ir/19-4/paper644.html#.VUIYfk0cRjo
Sterner, E. (2020). Science/STEM librarianship in 2020: Opportunities and insight. Science & Technology Libraries, 39(4), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2020.1781023
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Frame, M., Birch, B., Baird, L., Sandusky, R., Langseth, M., & Hughes, D. (2015). Research data services in academic libraries: Data intensive roles for the future? Journal of eScience Librarianship, 4(2), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085
Thomson, J. (2023). Information literacy support for mathematics graduate students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 102. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2687
Wang, M. L., Weng, Y. R., & Cheung, H. K. (2023). Inquiry-based learning integrated information literacy instruction for the university undergraduates: A case study using place memory topic. In C. C. Chen, M. L. Wang, S. K. W. Chu, E. Ishita, K. Tuamsuk, & M. S. Shamila (Eds.), Information literacy education of higher education in Asian countries (pp. 63–84). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0522-5_4
Yevelson-Shorsher, A., & Bronstein, J. (2018). Three perspectives on information literacy in academia: Talking to librarians, faculty, and students. College & Research Libraries, 79(4), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.4.535
Zanin-Yost, A. (2018). Academic collaborations: Linking the role of the liaison/embedded librarian to teaching and learning. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1455548
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jennifer Burke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.
