Review of Online Tools to Combat Gendered Citation Bias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2895Keywords:
Citation bias, Gender disparity, Women in scienceAbstract
Recent research shows a disparity in citation rates between articles authored by women and the expected citations rates in several scientific disciplines. The gender imbalance in citation lists has prompted the development of digital tools aimed at helping authors identify gender bias in their references lists. This article examines three tools designed to mitigate gender disparities in citations: the Gender Citation Balance Index (GCBI) GCBI-alyzer for the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (JoCN), the Citation Transparency (v0.0.8) browser extension for Chrome, and the Gage directory by 500 Women Scientists. The paper also explores how science librarians can contribute to raising awareness of citation bias and the digital tools available to address it.
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association. (2025). Equity, diversity, and inclusion toolkit for journal editors (2nd ed.). https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/equity-diversity-inclusion-toolkit-journal-editors.pdf
Caplar, N., Tacchella, S. & Birrer, S. (2017). Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts. Nature Astronomy, 1(6), Article 0141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0141
Chatterjee, P. & Werner, R. M. (2021). Gender disparity in citations in high-impact journal articles. JAMA Network Open, 4(7), Article e2114509. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509
Citation Transparency Tools. (2023). Citation Transparency (v.0.0.8) [Computer software]. Chrome Web Store. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/cepnbdbhabaljgecaddglhhcgajphbcf
Dworkin, J. D., Linn, K. A., Teich, E. G., Zurn, P., Shinohara, R. T., & Bassett, D. S. (2020). The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience, 23(8), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y
Feeney, P. (2021, October 22). Metadata principles and practices. Crossref. https://www.crossref.org/documentation/principles-practices/
Fulvio, J.M., Akinnola, I., & Postle, B.R. (2021). Gender (im)balance in citation practices in cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01643
GenderAPI.io. (2024). GenderAPI. https://www.genderapi.io/
Heidt, A. (2023, April 28). Racial inequalities in journals highlighted in giant study. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01457-4
Kong, H., Martin-Gutierrez, S., & Karimi, F. (2022). Influence of the first-mover advantage on the gender disparities in physics citations. Communications Physics, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00997-x
Kwon, D. (2022). The rise of citational justice. Nature, 603, 568-571. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00793-1
McCullagh, E., Nowak, K. & Zelikova, J. (2021, January 13). Gage: Quashing the Matilda effect. 500 Women Scientists. https://500womenscientists.medium.com/gage-quashing-the-matilda-effect-5d917f55a0e1
Penders, B. (2018). Ten simple rules for responsible referencing. PLOS Computational Biology, 14(4), Article e1006036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006036
Postle, B. R. & Fulvio, J. M. (2021). One-year update from the Editor-in-Chief. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_e_01799
Ray, K. S., Zurn, P., Dworkin, J. D., Bassett, D. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2022). Citation bias, diversity, and ethics. Accountability in Research, 31(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257
Royal Society of Chemistry. (2025). Inclusion and diversity resources. Royal Society of Chemistry. Retrieved March 21, 2025, from https://www.rsc.org/policy-evidence-campaigns/inclusion-diversity/resources/
Sumner, J. L. (2018). The Gender Balance Assessment Tool (GBAT): A web-based tool for estimating gender balance in syllabi and bibliographies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(2), 396–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517002074
Teich, E. G., Kim, J. Z., Lynn, C. W., Simon, S. C., Klishin, A. A., Szymula, K. P., Srivastava, P., Bassett, L. C., Zurn, P., Dworkin, J. D., & Bassett, D. S. (2022). Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics. Nature Physics, 18, 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01770-1
West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS ONE, 8(7), Article e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212
Zhou, D., Stiso, J., Bertolero, M., Cornblath, E., Teich, E., Sizemore Blevins, A., Murphy, K., Oudyk, K., Michael, C., Urai, A., Matelsky, J., Virtualmario, Camp C., Alacantra Castillo, R., Saxe, R., Dworkin, J., & Bassett, D. (2022). Diversity statement and code notebook: dalejn/cleanBib. (Version 1.1.3) [Computer code]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3672109
Zurn, P., Teich, E. G., Simon, S. C., Kim, J. Z., & Bassett, D. S. (2022). Supporting academic equity in physics through citation diversity. Communications Physics, 5, Article 240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00999-9
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joanna Blair

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.


