Mixing Digital Humanities and Applied Science Librarianship

Using Voyant Tools to Reveal Word Patterns in Faculty Research

Authors

  • Holly Hendrigan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl3

Abstract

Awareness of faculty research interests is an important aspect of a subject librarian's responsibilities. This paper illustrates the potential of Voyant Tools, an application in wide use among digital humanities researchers, to reveal word patterns in the research output of applied science faculty. A corpus of recent article citations from Web of Science from two engineering departments was obtained, and the articles' title field was extracted and uploaded to the application. The exercise indicated that articles on fuel cells dominates the research output of one department, and articles on optical coherence tomography dominates the other. Both the corpus of citations and its visualizations in Voyant Tools contribute to librarians' knowledge of their departments and historical spending patterns on specialized resources. This knowledge can be used in professional practice, including collection development and instruction. As academic subject areas become increasingly complex and multidisciplinary, this paper encourages librarians to engage with Voyant Tools to better understand the specialized language and concepts of these evolving fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Holly Hendrigan

Liaison Librarian
Faculty of Applied Sciences
Simon Fraser University
Surrey, BC, Canada
holly_hendrigan@sfu.ca

References

Bello, L., Clements N., Dickerson M. & Hogarth M. 2016. Critical Collection Analysis: Using DH Tools to Contextualize Historical Collecting Patterns within a Political Framework. [Internet]. [Cited 2018 May 1]. Paper presented at: Charleston, South Carolina. Available from http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=library_staff

Bryson, T., Posner, M., St. Pierre, A. & Varner, S. 2011. SPEC Kit 326, Digital Humanities. [Internet]. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries [Cited 2018 May 2]. Available from https://publications.arl.org/Digital-Humanities-SPEC-Kit-326/

Campbell, P.C. 2018. Narrowing the scope: transitioning from general librarianship to specialized subject liaisons. [Internet]. [Cited 2018 July 11]. Paper presented at: CAPAL Conference 2018. University of Regina: Canadian Association of Professional Academic Librarians. Available from https://capalibrarians.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/6A_Campbell_paper.pdf

Cataldo, T.T., Tennant, M.R., Sherwill-Navarro, P. & Jesano, R. 2006. Subject specialization in a liaison librarian program. Journal of the Medical Library Association 94(4):446-448. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1629419/pdf/i1536-5050-094-04-0446.pdf

Cleary, P., Garlock, K., Novak, D., Pullman, E. & Mann, S. 2017. Text mining 101: what you should know. The Serials Librarian 72(1-4):156-159. doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2017.1320876

Drewry, J.M. 2016. Changing fields within academic and research libraries. In: Sobel K, editor. Mastering Subject Specialties: Practical Advice from the Field. ABC-CLIO. p. 143-154.

Fritzler, P. 2013. Made from scratch: the creation and development of a sciences librarian. In: Kreitz P.A. & DeVries J., editors. Recruiting, Training, and Retention of Science and Technology Librarians. London: Routledge. p. 99-112.

Gao, W. & Wallace, L. 2017. Data mining, visualizing, and analyzing faculty thematic relationships for research support and collection analysis. In: ACRL 2017 Conference Proceedings. Baltimore: ALA. p. 171-178.

Graham, S., Milligan, I. & Weingart, S. 2015. Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian's Macroscope. London: Imperial College Press.

Hagler, R. 1991. The Bibliographic Record and Information Technology. Second ed. Chicago: ALA.

Harris, J. 2011. Word clouds considered harmful. Nieman Lab. [Internet]. [Cited 2018 May 1]. Available from http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/10/word-clouds-considered-harmful/

Hixson, T. 2018. Assessing Spatial Literacy: Results from a one-shot instruction session with undergraduate students [Internet]. [Cited 2018 May 1]. Available from https://www.slideshare.net/TaylorHixson1/assessing-spatial-literacy-results-from-a-oneshot-instruction-session-with-undergraduate-students

Jensen, K. 2009. Engaging faculty through collection development utilizing online survey tools. Collection Building 28(3):117-121. doi: 10.1108/01604950910971143

Maness, J.M. 2016. Engineering and applied science librarianship. In: Sobel K, editor. Mastering Subject Specialties: Practical Advice from the Field. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 31-38.

Moretti, F. 2013. Distant Reading. London: Verso.

Morgan, E.L. 2011. Next-generation library catalogs, or 'Are we there yet?' infomotions mini-mMusings. [Internet]. [Cited 2018 Mar 22]. Available from http://infomotions.com/blog/2011/06/next-generation-library-catalogs-or-are-we-there-yet/

Oberhelman, D.D. 2015. The critical theory of digital humanities for literature subject librarians. In: Hartsell-Gundy, A., Braunstein, L., & Golomb, L., editors. Digital Humanities in the Library: Challenges and Opportunities for Subject Specialists. Chicago: American Library Association. p. 53-68.

Oliver, A. & Prosser, E. 2017. Choosing academic librarianship: an examination of characteristics and selection criteria. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 43(6):526-531. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2017.08.009

Simon Fraser University, Institutional Research and Planning. 2017a. School of Engineering Science Academic Information Report. [Internet]. [Cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from http://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/irp/departments/ensc_summary.pdf

Simon Fraser University, Institutional Research and Planning. 2017b. Mechatronic Systems Engineering Academic Information Report. [Internet]. [Cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from http://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/irp/departments/mse_summary.pdf

Smiley, B. & Rodriguez, M. 2017. Digital humanities and academic libraries. In: McDonald J.D. & Levine-Clark, M., editors. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Fourth edition. Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press. p. 1298-1306.

Tscharntke, T., Hochberg M.E., Rand T.A., Resh V.H. & Krauss J. 2007. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLOS Biology 5(1):13-14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018

Voyant Tools. [Internet]. Available from http://www.voyant-tools.org

Wellings, S. & Casselden, B. 2017. An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science doi: 10.1177/0961000617742466

Zhang, L. 2015. Use of library services by engineering faculty at Mississippi State University, a large land Grant institution. Science & Technology Libraries 34(3):272286. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2015.1090941

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

How to Cite

Hendrigan, H. (2019). Mixing Digital Humanities and Applied Science Librarianship: Using Voyant Tools to Reveal Word Patterns in Faculty Research. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (91). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl3

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles