Composing meaning through multiliteracies and multimodality with adolescent and adult learners

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29587

Keywords:

multimodality, multiliteracies, social semiotics, adult education, secondary school education

Abstract

The research from this ongoing nationally funded study explores multiliteracies and multimodality in secondary schools and adult education settings including a museum, dance studio, and French language learning centre. There are 30 participants to date in the study. Using constructivist grounded theory methodology, the study draws upon data from face-to-face interviews, observations, document analysis, and original film footage of learning spaces. Social semiotics theory is used in this paper to articulate how a range of modes (visual, linguistic, and gestural) affect teaching and learning. The findings suggest that multiliteracies and multimodality foster creativity and criticality, engage marginalized learners, and provide greater versatility in meaning-making practices.

Author Biographies

Dr. Susan M. Holloway, University of Windsor

Susan M. Holloway is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Education at the University of Windsor. She is the Principal Investigator on a current SSHRC Insight grant, and her research interests include multiliteracies, multimodality, socio-cultural approaches to second language acquisition theory, content area literacy, adult education, critical and feminist theory.

Rasha Qaisi, University of Windsor

Rasha Qaisi is a PhD student in Educational Studies focusing on Social/Cultural/Political Contexts of Education. Rasha has been working on The Multiliteracies Project as a graduate research assistant for two years, and her research interests include multiliteracies, adult education, critical literacy, and social justice education.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-19

How to Cite

Holloway, S. ., & Qaisi, R. (2022). Composing meaning through multiliteracies and multimodality with adolescent and adult learners. Language and Literacy, 24(2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29587