What Do Reference Librarians Do Now?
Keywords:Reference, Reference Transactions, Reference Services, Academic Librarians, Reference Librarians, Statistics, roles
Objective - The primary purpose of this study was to better understand the nature of “reference” and reference transactions.
Methods - This study looked at four years’ of reference transaction (RT) data recorded at a small, state-owned university.
Results - The data clearly indicates that the overall number of RT continues to decline. It also reveals that, despite the use of student mentors, librarians are still involved with a majority of RT, regardless of whether or not they require the expertise of a librarian to resolve.
Conclusion - Continuing to be involved with RT which do not require the knowledge or training of a librarian (e.g., directional) can have a diminutive effect on the perceived role, work, and value of librarians. As such, it is suggested that these sorts of questions be addressed by student mentors or staff members. In turn, this will allow librarians to focus on those questions and activities which do require their unique knowledge and skills. Along similar lines, it is also suggested that librarians explore and identify new, non-traditional ways of applying their expertise to student success initiatives and the overall academic life of the institution. With the merger of three libraries, data from this study has been and continues to be used to make informed decisions about the provision of reference services in a new, integrated library environment.
American Library Association. (2008). Academic libraries in the United States statistical trends. ALA Office for Research & Statistics. http://www.ala.org/research/librarystats/academic/academiclibraries
Bandyopadhyay, A., & Boyd-Byrnes, M. K. (2016). Is the need for mediated reference service in academic libraries fading away in the digital environment? Reference Services Review, 44(4), 596-626. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-02-2016-0012
Banks, J., & Pracht, C. (2008). Reference desk staffing trends. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.48n1.54
Bell, S. J. (2007). Who needs a reference desk? Library Issues: Briefings for Faculty and Administrators, 27(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/125
Buss, S. P. (2016). Do we still need reference services in the age of Google and Wikipedia? The Reference Librarian, 57(4), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2015.1134377
Carlson, S. (2007, April 20). Are reference desks dying out? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(33), A37–A39. https://www.chronicle.com/article/are-reference-desks-dying-out/
Clark, K. T., Gabriel, H. M., & Borysewicz, K. (2020). Development, implementation and importance of an undergraduate peer research consultant program at the University of North Dakota’s Chester Fritz Library. Reference Services Review, 48(4), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-05-2020-0036
Cottrell, T. L., & Bell, B. (2015). Library savings through student labor. The Bottom Line, 28(3), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-05-2015-0006
Detmering, R., & Sproles, C. (2012). Forget the desk job: Current roles and responsibilities in entry-level reference job advertisements. College & Research Libraries, 73(6), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-304
Eliot, C. (n.d.). Harvard-Radcliffe Online Historical Reference Shelf. Forty-Ninth Annual Report of the President of Harvard College: 1873–1874. https://iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:427074985$41i
Ewing, K., & Hauptman, R. (1995). Is traditional reference service obsolete? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0099-1333(95)90144-2
Ford, B. J. (1986). Reference beyond (and without) the reference desk. College & Research Libraries 47(5), 491-94. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_47_05_491
Freides, T. (1983). Current trends in academic libraries. Library Trends, 31(3), 457-474.
Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
Green, S. S. (1876, November 30). Personal relations between librarians and readers. American Library Journal, 1(2-3), 74-81.
Houston, A. (2016). What’s in a name? Toward a new definition of reference. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(3), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n3.186
Johnson, A. M. (2018). Connections, conversations, and visibility: How the work of academic reference and liaison librarians is evolving. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.2.6929
Keyes, K., & Dworak, E. (2017). Staffing chat reference with undergraduate student assistants at an academic library: A standards-based assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(6), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.001
Lenkart, J., & Yu, J. (2017). Specialized reference services at Illinois: Reference transactional analysis and its implications for service providers and administrators. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(4), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.56.4.268
Lewis, D. W. (1995). Traditional reference is dead, now let’s move on to important questions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 10-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0099-1333(95)90146-9
Maloney, K., & Kemp, J. H. (2015). Changes in reference question complexity following the implementation of a proactive chat system: Implications for practice. College & Research Libraries, 76(7), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.7.959
Miles, D. B. (2013). Shall we get rid of the reference desk? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 52(4), 320-333. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.52n4.320
Reference and User Services Association: RUSA. (2008, September 29). Definitions of Reference. http://rusa.ala.org/blog/2008/01/31/rusa-approves-new-definition-of-reference/DocumentID:d42fff7a-8841-1ad4-c188-ee0259d6e7ad
Ross, C. S., & Dewdney, P. (1998). Negative closure: Strategies and counter-strategies in the reference transaction. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(2), 151-163.
Ryan, S. M. (2008). Reference transactions analysis: The cost-effectiveness of staffing a traditional academic reference desk, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.06.002
Saint Clair, J. W., Aluri, R., & Pastine, M. (1977). Staffing the reference desk: Professionals or nonprofessionals? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3(3), 149-153.
Shachaf, P. (2009). The paradox of expertise: Is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library? Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 977-996. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910998951
Sosulski, N. W., & Tyckoson, D. A. (2016). A reference for that: “What are we stopping?” And “what is shifting?” Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(2), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.56n2.87
Stevens, C. R. (2013). Reference reviewed and re-envisioned: Revamping librarian and desk-centric services with LibStARs and LibAnswers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.006
Summerhill, K. S. (1994). The high cost of reference: The need to reassess services and service delivery. The Reference Librarian, 20(43), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v20n43_07
Weber, J. E., & Bowron, C. R. (2019). The evolving reference desk: If we scrap it, then what? Tennessee Libraries, 69(2). https://www.tnla.org/page/69_2_Weber
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Monty L. McAdoo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.