Using ISI Web of Science to Compare Top-Ranked Journals to the Citation Habits of a "Real World" Academic Department.

Authors

  • Jeremy Cusker

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1557

Abstract

Quantitative measurements can be used to yield lists of top journals for individual fields. However, these lists represent assessments of the entire "universe" of citation. A much more involved process is needed if the goal is to develop a nuanced picture of what a specific group of authors, such as an academic department, is citing. This article presents a method for using ISI Web of Science in conjunction with spreadsheet management to compare lists of top journals from ISI and Eigenfactor with the journal titles that a list of authors are citing in their own publications. The resulting data can be used in collection development, departmental contacts, and in assessing the research interests of an academic department. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blecic, D.D. 1999. Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between 3 methods. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 87(1): 20-25.

Cooper, M. and McGregor, G. 1994, Using article photocopy data in bibliographic models for journal collection management. Library Quarterly 64 (10): 386-413.

Eigenfactor. 2012. Mapping science. Science Browser. [Internet.] [Cited 2012 May 11]. Available from: http://eigenfactor.org/map/index.php

Elkins, M., Maher, C., Herbert, R., Mosley, A., Sherrington, C. 2010. Correlations between journal impact factor and 3 other journal citation metrics. Scientometrics 85(1) (10): 81-93.

Faculty of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 2011. Faculty for Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. [Internet]. [Cited 2012 February 7]. Available from: {http://www.eas.cornell.edu/eas/people/faculty.cfm}

ISI Web of Knowledge. 2012. Web of Knowledge. [Internet]. [Cited 2012 February 7]. Available from: http://www.webofknowledge.com/

Jacobs, N., Woodfield, J. and Morris, A. 2000. Using local citation data to relate the use of journal articles by academic researchers to the coverage of full-text document access systems. Journal of Documentation 56(5): 563-583.

Nisonger, T.E. 2004. The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries. The Serials Librarian 47(1-2): 57-75.

Pan, E. 1978. Journal citation as a predictor of journal usage in libraries. Collection Management 2 (Spring): 29-38.

Schmidt, D., and Davis, E.B. 1994. Biology journal use at an academic library: a comparison of use studies. Serials Review 20(2): 45

Smeyers, P., and Burbules, N.C. 2011. How to improve your impact factor: questioning the quantification of academic quality. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45(1): 1-17.

Stankus, T. and Rice, B. 1982. Handle with care: use and citation data for science journal management. Collection Management 4 (Spring/Summer): 95-110.

Downloads

Published

2012-08-01

How to Cite

Cusker, J. (2012). Using ISI Web of Science to Compare Top-Ranked Journals to the Citation Habits of a "Real World" Academic Department. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (70). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1557

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |