A Survey of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Mathematics Faculty Regarding Author Fees in Open Access Journals.

Authors

  • Jeremy Cusker
  • Anne E. Rauh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1617

Abstract

Discussions of the potential of open access publishing frequently must contend with the skepticism of research authors regarding the need to pay author fees (also known as publication fees). With that in mind, the authors undertook a survey of faculty, postdocs, and graduate students in physical science, mathematics, and engineering fields at two research universities (Cornell University and Syracuse University) asking for their experience with and opinion of paying author fees for publication of research in open access journals. The results of this survey indicated that most respondents had not decided against publishing in an open access journal due to the author fee requirement. Those who had paid them only requested or received coverage for those fees in grant line-items or from institutional sources in a few cases. Responses seemed to combine cautious optimism about open access journals with intense skepticism about their quality and intense opposition to the idea of having to pay any additional costs from their own pockets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albert, K. M. 2006. Open access: Implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 94(3):253-262.

Arxiv. 2014. arXiv.org. [Internet[. Available from: http://arxiv.org

Arxiv. 2012. Initial 5-Year Support Pledges. [Internet]. Available from: https://confluence.cornell.edu/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=174295285.

Butler, D. 2013. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature 495(1442): 433-435.

Carozza, J. 2014. Cornell scientists encourage open access publishing. Cornell Daily Sun. May 7, 2014.

Coonin, B. and Younce, L.M. 2010. Publishing in open access education journals: The authors' perspectives. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 29(2):118-32.

Fowler, K.K. 2011. Mathematicians' views on current publishing issues: A survey of researchers. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 67. Available from: http://www.istl.org/11-fall/refereed4.html

Nariani, R. and Fernandez, L. 2012. Open access publishing: What authors want. College and Research Libraries 73(2):182-95.

Peng, Y. 2009. University creates $50K fund to aid open-access publishing. Cornell Daily Sun. October 1, 2009.

Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., and Huntington, P. 2004. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want? Learned Publishing 17(4):261-73.

Solomon, D. and Bjork, B. 2011. Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(1): 98-107.

Schroter, S., Tite, L., and Smith, R. 2005. Perceptions of open access publishing: Interviews with journal authors. BMJ 330(7494):756.

Warlick, S.E. and Vaughan, K.T. 2007. Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries 4:1.

Xia, J. 2010. A longitudinal study of scholars' attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(3): 615-624.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Cusker, J., & Rauh, A. E. (2014). A Survey of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Mathematics Faculty Regarding Author Fees in Open Access Journals. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (78). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1617

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |