Assessing Reference: Using the Wisconsin-Ohio Reference Evaluation Program in an Academic Science Library.

Theme: Assessment

Authors

  • Amy Paster
  • Kathy Fescemyer
  • Nancy Henry
  • Janet Hughes
  • Helen Smith

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2055

Abstract

The Pennsylvania State University Life Sciences Library conducted the Wisconsin-Ohio Reference Evaluation Program survey in October 2005. The results of the survey indicated that the desk personnel do an average job in fulfilling the library user's expectations. Known-item questions were handled well but non-known questions need additional training to ensure patrons are not receiving too much information. This project raised a number of questions concerning user satisfaction and library type. It is hoped that this article can serve as the baseline for future research in the evaluation of science reference question transactions and patron satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Association of Research Libraries. 2004. ARL Statistics. [Online]. Available: {http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/arl/} [Accessed April 13, 2006].

Bunge, C.A. 1991. Gathering and using patron and librarian perceptions of question-answering success. In: Evaluation of Public Services and Public Services Personnel (ed. by B. Allen), pp.59-83. Champaign, Ill.: University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science.

Christensen, B.E., Du Mont, M.J. & Green, A. 2001. Taking note: assessing the performance of reference service in academic music libraries: a progress report. Notes 58(1):39-54.

Lasocki, D. 2002. A critique and response to the use of the instrument in the published study "Taking Note: Assessing the performance of Reference Service in Academic Music Libraries" (Notes, September 2001, pp.39-54). Notes 58(3): 699-703.

LibQUAL Home Page. n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.libqual.org/ [Accessed April 13, 2006].

Moysa, S. 2004. Evaluation of customer service behaviour at the reference desk in an academic library. Feliciter 50(2):60-63.

Murfin, M. E. and Gugelchuk, G. M. 1987. Development and testing of a reference transaction assessment instrument. College & Research Libraries 48:314-38.

Radcliff, C. 2006. List of WOREP participating libraries. E-mail correspondence April 25, 2006.

Richardson, J. V. 2002. Reference is better than we thought. Library Journal 127(7): 41-42.

Robbins, K. & Daniels, K. 2001. Benchmarking reference desk service in academic health science libraries: a preliminary survey. College & Research Libraries 62(4):348-353.

Stalker, J.C., & Murfin, M.E. 1996. Quality reference service: a preliminary case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 22(6): 423-429.

Wisconsin-Ohio Reference Evaluation Program. n.d. [Online]. Available: {http://worep.library.kent.edu/} [Accessed April 13, 2006].

Downloads

Published

2006-05-31

How to Cite

Paster, A., Fescemyer, K., Henry, N., Hughes, J., & Smith, H. (2006). Assessing Reference: Using the Wisconsin-Ohio Reference Evaluation Program in an Academic Science Library.: Theme: Assessment. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (46). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2055

Issue

Section

Board Accepted Articles
Share |