STEM Faculty Perceptions of Library Research Support and Bibliometric Services: A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2879Keywords:
STEM faculty, Interviews, Library research support, Bibliometric services, Research impact evaluation, RDM (research data management) plan, Open Access (OA) publishing, Transformative agreements, Information seeking behaviors, Reflexive thematic analysisAbstract
Academic librarians strive to provide quality support for faculty researchers. Existing content analysis of top-ranking university libraries’ websites revealed the main types of research services provided by academic librarians. But what specific services do STEM faculty consider essential for their research needs? What are the most effective communication methods to convey research service information to STEM faculty? How do STEM faculty follow cutting-edge developments in their fields? Do STEM faculty value information provided by bibliometric tools? This study attempts to answer the above questions through interviews with 30 STEM faculty at a medium-sized R1 university. Patterns in each discipline and across all interviews were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis to capture both semantic/surface and latent/implicit meanings of participants’ comments. Findings demonstrate that their data management needs go beyond a plan template, and they do not prioritize open access publishing. Along with their communication preference, current awareness of tool preferences and perceptions of bibliometric tools, and research impact evaluation are shared.
Downloads
References
Athukorala, K., Hoggan, E., Lehtiö, A., Ruotsalo, T., & Jacucci, G. (2013). Information‐seeking behaviors of computer scientists: Challenges for electronic literature search tools. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001041
Björk, B. C., & Korkeamäki, T. (2020). Adoption of the open access business model in scientific journal publishing: A cross-disciplinary study. College & Research Libraries, 81(7), 1080-1094. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.7.1080
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/successful-qualitative-research/book233059
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/thematic-analysis/book248481
Buetow, S. (2010). Thematic analysis and its reconceptualization as ‘saliency analysis.’ Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15(2), 123-125. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009081
Chawla, D. S. (2024, April 4). A key chemistry journal disappeared from the web. Others are at risk. Chemistry World. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/a-key-chemistry-journal-disappeared-from-the-web-others-are-at-risk/4019265.article
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Chen, X., & Wu, M. (2017). Survey on the needs for chemistry research data management and sharing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(4), 346-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.006
Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
Dodd, A. (2024). Navigating open access and transformative agreements: A case study of the University of Maryland. Library Resources & Technical Services, 68(1-2). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n1.8219
Ducas, A., Michaud-Oystryk, N., & Speare, M. (2020). Reinventing ourselves: New and emerging roles of academic librarians in Canadian research-intensive universities. College & Research Libraries, 81(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.1.43
Engel, D., Robbins, S., & Kulp, C. (2011). The information-seeking habits of engineering faculty. College & Research Libraries, 72(6), 548-567. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-155
Faniel, I. M., & Connaway, L. S. (2018). Librarians' perspectives on the factors influencing research data management programs. College & Research Libraries, 79(1), 100-119. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.1.100
Fernández-Marcial, V., Costa, L. M., & González-Solar, L. (2016, June 5–9). Top universities, top libraries: Do research services in academic libraries contribute to university output [Paper presentation]. IATUL Conference, Halifax, NS, Canada. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2016/spaces/2
Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S., & Brooks, T. (2010). Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics. Scientometrics, 84(2), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0111-1
Gordon, I. D., Cameron, B. D., Chaves, D., & Hutchinson, R. (2020). Information seeking behaviors, attitudes, and choices of academic mathematicians. Science & Technology Libraries, 39(3), 253-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2020.1758284
Gordon, I. D., Chaves, D., Dearborn, D., Hendrikx, S., Hutchinson, R., Popovich, C., & White, M. (2022). Information seeking behaviors, attitudes, and choices of academic physicists. Science & Technology Libraries, 41(3), 288-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991546
Gordon, I. D., Meindl, P., White, M., & Szigeti, K. (2018). Information seeking behaviors, attitudes, and choices of academic chemists. Science & Technology Libraries, 37(2), 130-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2018.1445063
Gumpenberger, C., Wieland, M., & Gorraiz, J. (2012). Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna. Library Management, 33(3), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211217199
Gutzman, K. E., Bales, M. E., Belter, C. W., Chambers, T., Chan, L., Holmes, K. L., Lu, Y.-L., Palmer, L. A., Reznik-Zellen, R. C., Sarli, C. C., Suiter, A. M., & Wheeler, T. R. (2018). Research evaluation support services in biomedical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.205
Hadad, S., & Aharony, N. (2024). Librarians and academic libraries’ role in promoting open access: What needs to change? College & Research Libraries, 85(4), 464-478. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.4.464
Krantz, S. G. (2017). Essentials of mathematical thinking. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315116822
Malone, A. (2023). Trends in Research Impact Librarianship: Developing a new program and services. Journal of Library Administration, 63(7), 867-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2262364
Miller, A., Johnson, J., Cline, L., Edgar, W., Fischer, S., & Jackson-Brown, G. (2023a). Research content as an expression of the scholarly information seeking habits and behavior of university faculty. Journal of Library Administration, 63(4), 446-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2201718
Miller, A., Johnson, J., Cline, L., Edgar, W., Fischer, S., & Jackson-Brown, G. (2023b). Research services and spaces as expressions of the scholarly information seeking habits and behavior of university faculty. Journal of Library Administration, 63(5), 633-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2219597
Nickels, C., & Davis, H. (2020). Understanding researcher needs and raising the profile of library research support. Insights, 33(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.493
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962
Rawlins, B. (2024). Are transformative agreements worth it? An analysis of open access publication data at the University of Kentucky. Library Resources & Technical Services, 68(1-2). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n1.8211
Si, L., Zeng, Y., Guo, S., & Zhuang, X. (2019). Investigation and analysis of research support services in academic libraries. The Electronic Library, 37(2), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2018-0125
Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21660
Suiter, A. M., & Moulaison, H. L. (2015). Supporting scholars: An analysis of academic library websites' documentation on metrics and impact. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 814-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.004
Tang, R., & Hu, Z. (2019). Providing research data management (RDM) services in libraries: Preparedness, roles, challenges, and training for RDM practice. Data and Information Management, 3(2), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2019-0009
Tucci, V. K. (2011). Assessing information-seeking behavior of computer science and engineering faculty. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5062/F4H12ZXJ
University of Central Florida Libraries (n.d.). Overview: Research lifecycle. Retrieved January 18, 2025, from https://library.ucf.edu/about/departments/scholarly-communication/overview-research-lifecycle
Wellings, S., & Casselden, B. (2017). An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 789-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742466
Yoon, A., & Schultz, T. (2017). Research data management services in academic libraries in the US: A content analysis of libraries’ websites. College & Research Libraries, 78(7), 920-933. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.7.920
Young, J. S., & Brandes, P. M. (2020). Green and gold open access citation and interdisciplinary advantage: A bibliometric study of two science journals. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(2), 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102105
Zhang, L. (2015). Use of library services by engineering faculty at Mississippi State University, a large land grant institution. Science & Technology Libraries, 34(3), 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1090941
Zhang, L., & Watson, E. M. (2017). Measuring the impact of gold and green open access. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(4), 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004
Zhang, M. M., Wu, D. R., Chen, H. Z., & Zhou, T. M. (2024). WeChat official accounts in medical academic libraries: A study on publication status and communication impact in China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(6), 102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102946
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuening Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.
